Facebook backtracks on data sharing plans
By Tom Brewster,
Facebook has put the brakes on plans to open up mobile numbers and phone addresses to app developers.
After the social network revealed its plans last week, introducing a feature allowing users to share such information with developers, it came under fire from various sources.
Users and security professionals alike lambasted the service for not making the opt-in option clearer.
Now it seems Facebook has listened to people’s concerns and decided to temporarily disable the feature and update it to ensure users only share their data when they intend to do so.
“We’ll be working to launch these updates as soon as possible, and will be temporarily disabling this feature until those changes are ready,” Facebook explained in a blog post.
“We look forward to re-enabling this improved feature in the next few weeks.”
Purdy said Facebook would be looking to “make people more clearly aware of when they are granting access to this data.”
Chester Wisniewski, senior security advisor at Sophos Canada, was positive about Facebook’s willingness to listen to user complaints.
“Facebook has been pushing the boundaries of privacy for a long time, but despite the uproar, few in the community have abandoned the service,” Wisniewski said in a blog post.
“It is great news that Facebook is responding to the outrage about this recent change, but I wonder if most users will be satisfied with their eventual solution… Users still place a great deal of trust in Facebook, and the service has an obligation to live up to that expectation.”
Users to blame for Facebook privacy problems?
During an Information Security Forum (ISF) event held this morning in central London, global vice president of the group Steve Durbin argued users should be much more responsible when it came to their Facebook privacy.
“You can’t move away from personal duty,” Durbin told IT PRO.
He admitted, however, there needed to be greater collaboration between users and Facebook itself on improving privacy on the site.
“There has to be a coming together of the two,” he added.
Adrian Davis, principal research analyst at the ISF, suggested Facebook “could do better, they could listen more.”
“There should be a grown-up conversation about how to use these things, whilst not damaging the individual or the business,” he added.
You may also like...
Sponsored Links
advertisement
You may also like...
Latest Security Analysis & Insight
What is your password worth?
Would you be tempted to sell off company passwords for a fee? If not, seems like you're in the minority, acccording to research.
- Macs under attack?
- Intel: security inside
- Are you spending too much on IT security?
- Does the government want to snoop on your data?
- Eurocrats versus the cyber criminals
- The truth about spam
- Google and privacy: What’s the problem?
- Q&A: Symantec’s CISO on the source code hack
- RSA: Back from the breach?
Latest Security Reviews
Check Point 2210 Appliance review
Rating: ![]()
advertisement
Most popular
- UK regulator shuts down Angry Birds scam
- Apple iPad 3 vs iPad 2 head-to-head review
- IBM bans use of Siri on iPhones
- Chromebooks: What's gone wrong?
- HP plans massive job cuts
- EMC World 2012: Tucci declares Documentum is here to stay
- Dell EqualLogic PS6100XS review
- Macs and Android under malware threat
- RIM loses its head of sales
- Local fibre broadband needs common standards
Latest News Videos in Security
IT PRO Podcast: Are UK data protection laws flawed?
We bring in two experts to talk about the problems with UK data protection law and the way it is managed.
Register for IT PRO
You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.





