Boffins develop first programmable nanoprocessor
By Maggie Holland,
Researchers have developed the world's first programmable nanoprocessor, which could open up possibilities for adding intelligent functionality and greater scalabiilty to circuits but using a fraction of the space.
The breakthrough is the result of a collaboration between teams at Harvard University and MITRE, who have used nanowire tiles to carry out both arithmetic and logical functions. In practice, it will mean much more advanced computer circuitry can be produced on a nano scale.
"This work represents a quantum jump forward in the complexity and function of circuits built from the bottom up, and thus demonstrates that this bottom-up paradigm, which is distinct from the way commercial circuits are built today, can yield nanoprocessors and other integrated systems of the future," said Charles Lieber, who led the project and who also serves a dual role at Harvard's Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology and School of Engineering and Applied Sciences.
"For the past 10 to 15 years, researchers working with nanowires, carbon nanotubes, and other nanostructures have struggled to build all but the most basic circuits, in large part due to variations in properties of individual nanostructures. We have shown that this limitation can now be overcome and are excited about prospects of exploiting the bottom-up paradigm of biology in building future electronics."
Furthermore, these advanced circuits will also use much less power than traditional components thanks to the use of nonvolatile transistor switches.
"Because of their very small size and very low power requirements, these new nanoprocessor circuits are building blocks that can control and enable an entirely new class of much smaller, lighter weight electronic sensors and consumer electronics," added Shamik Das, lead engineer in MITRE's Nanosystems Group and co-author of the research.
Sponsored Links
advertisement
Latest Public Sector Analysis & Insight
The Digital Economy Act: Is it doomed to never happen?
As a further delay hits part of the implementation of the Digital Economy Act, is this just a small hiccup, or is the Act being rendered toothless already? Simon Brew takes a look.
- Does the government want to snoop on your data?
- Q&A: Rajeeb Dey, CEO Enternships
- Government IT: Apples for the mandarins
- Striving to solve the security skills crisis
- 2011: The year in news
- Are the cookie laws crumbling already?
- UK rural broadband: too little, and too late
- How the Data Protection Act's death will punish the UK economy
- Education: glad to be a geek
Latest Public Sector Reviews
HTC Flyer review: First Look
- HP TouchPad review: First Look
- RIM BlackBerry PlayBook review - First Look
- MWC 2011: Acer Iconia A100 and A500 reviews – first look videos
- MWC 2011: HP TouchPad review - first look video
- MWC 2011: RIM BlackBerry PlayBook review - first look video
- MWC 2011: HP Pre3 review - first look video
- MWC 2011: Motorola Pro review - first look video
- MWC 2011: HTC Flyer tablet review - first look video
- MWC 2011: Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 review – first look video
advertisement
Most popular
- UK regulator shuts down Angry Birds scam
- Apple iPad 3 vs iPad 2 head-to-head review
- IBM bans use of Siri on iPhones
- Chromebooks: What's gone wrong?
- HP plans massive job cuts
- EMC World 2012: Tucci declares Documentum is here to stay
- Dell EqualLogic PS6100XS review
- Macs and Android under malware threat
- RIM loses its head of sales
- Local fibre broadband needs common standards
Latest News Videos in Public Sector
Q&A: David Elton, PA Consulting Group
CIOs are increasingly influential, but have to juggle "dual roles", study finds.
Register for IT PRO
You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.



Why "Boffins"?
Do you really believe that people who read an article such as this are incapable of recognising the word "scientist" or even "engineer"? "Boffin" is an archaic slang word of uncertain meaning and might even be derogatory - I don't see you calling them "geeks" for example which would be the modern equivalent! Why don't you aspire to the same precision in your vocabulary that these SCIENTISTS aspire to in THEIR work - and stop insulting our intelligence in the process?
By Ip_Richard541178 on Tuesday Feb 15