Q&A: Eugene Kaspersky on taking on the big boys
By Tom Brewster,
Eugene Kaspersky is one of those people you don’t want to miss when he’s in town.
In recent, troubling news, the security software firm’s chief executive saw his son kidnapped before thankfully being freed. Prior to his personal peril, we managed to catch up with one of the most charismatic people in the security industry at the recent InfoSecurity 2011 conference in London.
From Kaspersky itself and its plans to take on the big players like Symantec and McAfee, to the potential end of desktop computing – in the home at least - he certainly had plenty to say.
Kaspersky wants to be one of the top three security companies in the world. How do you plan to achieve this?
I think there will be major changes in the consumer environment because of mobile systems – phones, tablets and, maybe, future devices we don’t have at the moment.
They are entering the home environment and I think they will replace computers at home because ordinary people they don’t really need computers. They need just the web, they need email, they need media editors, they need news and they need social networks.
Cyber criminals are paying more attention to the mobile environment. They have recognised they can earn a lot of money through attacks on mobile devices.
They don’t need professional software, they don’t need professional services like Microsoft Office or professional video editors and so on.
I have not seen the latest data from Apple, but I would not be surprised if its Mac [market] share is decreased and replaced by iPads. There is no need to have heavy machinery.
At the moment, consumer security is mostly computer-based, mostly Windows-based. It will slowly, year-by-year be replaced with mobile security.
Cyber criminals are paying more attention to the mobile environment. They have recognised they can earn a lot of money through attacks on mobile devices.
So the mobile market is where Kaspersky thinks it will make gains over competitors?
We are one of the major players in the mobile market. We understand that mobile security is important.
The first time we had our own booth at the [Mobile World Congress] conference in Barcelona was five years back. For the first two years, people came to us and said "Kaspersky, that’s security, it’s a mobile exhibition, what are you doing here?"
The third year, they started to come to us and asked questions about mobile security. On the fourth year we signed our first contract with a Middle Eastern telecoms company.
Last February, sometimes there was no space in our booth. Many people came, like mobile operators and manufacturers, mostly [to talk] about Android.
So how do you plan to topple the likes of Symantec and McAfee who have considerably more revenue than other security players, including Kaspersky?
This is a question which is not at all simple to answer. I had the same questions three or four years back, and I said our strategy is quite simple. First of all [our strategy is] to become number four, then number three, then number two, then number one.
Another answer is, to be number one in mobile security, stay there and wait until mobile devices replace computers.
You may also like...
Sponsored Links
advertisement
You may also like...
Latest Public Sector News
Government reveals plans for Open Data Institute
New body will oversee development of new businesses using government’s public datasets.
advertisement
Most popular
- UK regulator shuts down Angry Birds scam
- Apple iPad 3 vs iPad 2 head-to-head review
- IBM bans use of Siri on iPhones
- Chromebooks: What's gone wrong?
- HP plans massive job cuts
- EMC World 2012: Tucci declares Documentum is here to stay
- Dell EqualLogic PS6100XS review
- Macs and Android under malware threat
- RIM loses its head of sales
- Local fibre broadband needs common standards





He's got an edge
Kaspersky produces a better product than those "big boys" - way better than McAfee, especially. The only reason McAfee is still big is that the cost of changing security vendors is high for big companies. If these decisions were based purely on current performance, McAfee wouldn't even be in the top 5.
By greenknight32 on Sunday May 8