White House goes interventionist in cyber plans
By Tom Brewster,
The White House has proposed a range of cyber security laws to help organisations working in the US stay safe.
Amongst the proposals outlined yesterday by the Obama administration was a law enabling the Department for Homeland Security (DHS) to help companies or public bodies with security.
Greater focus would also be placed on critical infrastructure bodies under the proposals, requiring a third-party to audit their security strategies.
The DHS could also step in here to help shore up security in critical infrastructure organisations, such as energy firms or financial bodies.
“When our infrastructure is online, it is also vulnerable to cyber attacks that could cripple essential services,” the White House said in a statement.
“Our proposal emphasises transparency to help market forces ensure that critical-infrastructure operators are accountable for their cyber security.”
The proposals also included an idea to let the government and private industry temporarily exchange experts to help spread knowledge.
Similar legislation is currently being discussed in the US Congress.
Some have questioned whether the interventionist approach would be as effective as industry led improvements to security.
Others have questioned the strength of the White House’s ideas.
“The administration's proposal shows no sense of urgency," Stewart Baker, a former senior Homeland Security official, told the Associated Press.
"It tells even critical industries on which our lives and society depend that they will have years before anyone from government begins to evaluate their security measures."
The UK Government's cyber security plans could alter with the recent appointment of James Brokenshire as minister for security.
He replaced Baroness Pauline Neville-Jones, who resigned this week.
You may also like...
Sponsored Links
advertisement
You may also like...
Latest Security Analysis & Insight
What is your password worth?
Would you be tempted to sell off company passwords for a fee? If not, seems like you're in the minority, acccording to research.
- Macs under attack?
- Intel: security inside
- Are you spending too much on IT security?
- Does the government want to snoop on your data?
- Eurocrats versus the cyber criminals
- The truth about spam
- Google and privacy: What’s the problem?
- Q&A: Symantec’s CISO on the source code hack
- RSA: Back from the breach?
Latest Security Reviews
Check Point 2210 Appliance review
Rating: ![]()
advertisement
Most popular
- UK regulator shuts down Angry Birds scam
- Apple iPad 3 vs iPad 2 head-to-head review
- IBM bans use of Siri on iPhones
- Chromebooks: What's gone wrong?
- HP plans massive job cuts
- EMC World 2012: Tucci declares Documentum is here to stay
- Dell EqualLogic PS6100XS review
- Macs and Android under malware threat
- RIM loses its head of sales
- Local fibre broadband needs common standards
Latest News Videos in Security
IT PRO Podcast: Are UK data protection laws flawed?
We bring in two experts to talk about the problems with UK data protection law and the way it is managed.
Register for IT PRO
You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.





