ICO called on to punish Milton Keynes Council
By Tom Brewster,
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has been called on to reprimand Milton Keynes Council for a data breach which exposed citizens’ information.
The local authority admitted to accidentally posting results from a residents’ survey on its website, revealing addresses and phone numbers of 50 participants, the Milton Keynes Citizen reported.
Personal data from the survey, which asked for thoughts on a controversial park, remained online for around 18 hours towards the end of last week.
Dr Bob Ranger, who was against the play-park, was outraged by the council’s actions.
“Anybody could have seen all those details in the time they were online. Nobody will accept responsibility or offer a genuine apology,” Ranger said.
“We got a press statement written by the council’s PR department that is supposed to count as an apology but adds insult to injury and inflames a delicate situation even more.”
David Hill, chief executive of the council, said the organisation had apologised for the breach.
“Although not strictly required by the Information Commissioner’s Office guidelines, we have notified a breach of the data protection legislation to the ICO and launched a data protection investigation,” Hill added.
The Big Brother Watch called for the ICO to take action.
“This kind of basic mistake which seems to occur so often in local councils indicates both a lack of understanding of data protection and technology, as well as a lackadaisical approach to the privacy of local people,” the privacy group said in a blog post.
“The Information Commission should investigate this case and punish those responsible.”
The ICO received additional powers last year to fine companies up to £500,000 for data breaches. Thus far, the sum of fines handed out by the ICO is less than £500,000.
Last month, research indicated the ICO had fined less than one per cent of data breach cases since it was handed new powers.
“If the ICO continues to refuse to hand out punitive financial punishments for data protection breaches then they will keep occurring,” the Big Brother Watch added.
“Simply asking public bodies to sign undertakings to improve staff training will not solve these problems.”
At the time of publication, the ICO had not confirmed to IT PRO what action it was taking.
You may also like...
Sponsored Links
advertisement
You may also like...
Latest Security Analysis & Insight
What is your password worth?
Would you be tempted to sell off company passwords for a fee? If not, seems like you're in the minority, acccording to research.
- Macs under attack?
- Intel: security inside
- Are you spending too much on IT security?
- Does the government want to snoop on your data?
- Eurocrats versus the cyber criminals
- The truth about spam
- Google and privacy: What’s the problem?
- Q&A: Symantec’s CISO on the source code hack
- RSA: Back from the breach?
Latest Security Reviews
Check Point 2210 Appliance review
Rating: ![]()
advertisement
Most popular
- UK regulator shuts down Angry Birds scam
- Apple iPad 3 vs iPad 2 head-to-head review
- IBM bans use of Siri on iPhones
- Chromebooks: What's gone wrong?
- HP plans massive job cuts
- EMC World 2012: Tucci declares Documentum is here to stay
- Dell EqualLogic PS6100XS review
- Macs and Android under malware threat
- RIM loses its head of sales
- Local fibre broadband needs common standards
Latest News Videos in Security
IT PRO Podcast: Are UK data protection laws flawed?
We bring in two experts to talk about the problems with UK data protection law and the way it is managed.
Register for IT PRO
You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.






Fines are the wrong approach
Fining Local Authorities only hurts the already overburdened council tax payer. A more useful, effective and fair sanction would be to remove these bureaucrats from office.
By 6tricky9 on Tuesday May 24