Head to Head: Microsoft Office 2010 vs Open Office 3.3

By Karl Wright,
A new version of Open Office, the free office suite, has just been released into the wild. Apparently it’s been through a revamp and is now more compatible with Microsoft Office files. The press release accompanying the launch boasts that OpenOffice has gone from being the “free alternative” to the “preferred choice”. Interestingly, though, the new version hasn’t gone with a Microsoft Office-style “tabbed” Ribbon interface, but has instead stuck with familiar menus and toolbars.
Given that office users are more or less evenly divided between those who love and loath Microsoft’s tabbed interface, this seemed like a good time for a head to head. Has OpenOffice really managed to cut through the tangle of the old-style user interface to produce an office suite that’s both familiar and easy to use?
User interface & usability
Open Office isn’t anywhere near as cluttered as Microsoft Office 2003, so things were never that bad to start with. Still, it would have been nice to see some attempt at cleaning up the interface. Things look exactly as they did in the last edition of Open Office we reviewed, version 3.1.
This leaves OpenOffice with a user interface that hasn’t kept up with the easy-to-browse visual presentation of Microsoft Office 2010. In practice, this means that Microsoft Office makes it much less work to find and use the right tools for whatever job you’re doing - when you click the tab with the tools you need, it stays open for as long as you want it to.

The Ribbon interface in Office 2010 is divisive - you either love it or hate it.
For instance, if you want to add comments to a document, in Microsoft Office simply click the “Review” tab and all the commands relevant to reviewing a document appear on your toolbar. Then highlight the text you want and click the “New Comment” button. Since the Review tab stays open until you click into another tab, you can add as many comments as you need, each with just a single click.
You may also like...
Sponsored Links
advertisement
You may also like...
Latest Desktop Software News
ARM-based Windows 8 tablets facing delays
Sources claim Windows RT operating system could need a post-launch patch at the very least.
Latest Desktop Software Analysis & Insight
Could the UK ever build a Facebook?
Inside the enterprise: Building a $100bn tech company is a tall order. But the UK could still boost its technology industry, argues one expert.
advertisement
Most popular
- UK regulator shuts down Angry Birds scam
- Apple iPad 3 vs iPad 2 head-to-head review
- IBM bans use of Siri on iPhones
- Chromebooks: What's gone wrong?
- HP plans massive job cuts
- EMC World 2012: Tucci declares Documentum is here to stay
- Dell EqualLogic PS6100XS review
- Macs and Android under malware threat
- RIM loses its head of sales
- Local fibre broadband needs common standards
Register for IT PRO
You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.






Try Libre Office, not Open Office
Karl has got it all wrong.
Open Office 3.3 has been superseded by Libre Office 3.3.3
He does not mention that OOo is compatible with all of the many formats for Office.
MS Office is not even compatible with MS Office.
In order to force customers to update Microsoft did not make later versions compatible with their own earlier versions.
LOo and OOo can read and write to any MS Office.
Go back and have another go Karl.
Jubbjubb
By Jubbjubb on Friday Jun 24
RE: Try Libre Office, not Open Office
Hi Jubbjubb,
Thanks for your feedback.
LibreOffice was originally formed as a fork of the open-source OpenOffice.org project by ex-OpenOffice staffers who had concerns about Oracle's acquisition of Sun who effectively owned OpenOffice.org at the time.
However, Oracle has since donated OpenOffice.org to the Apache Foundation which should alleviate most concerns about Oracle's influence on the project.
Although we may review LibreOffice in the future, given all the above we still view OpenOffice as the pre-eminent open-source alternative to Microsoft Office and is, as far as we know, still in active development. LibreOffice is also very, very similar to OpenOffice. In any case, none of this should preclude a comparison of OpenOffice with Microsoft Office.
Regarding file formats, we cannot feasibly or economically test OpenOffice or Microsoft Office compatibility with every single past Microsoft Office file format. Karl did note a successful OpenOffice conversion of a fairly complex Excel spreadsheet. We also know of no problems relating to OpenOffice's compatibility with .rtf and Office 97-2003 files which we suspect comprise the bulk of office files currently in active use.
Kind regards,
Alan Lu
Reviews Editor
IT Pro
By pandaman on Friday Jun 24