Google+ spams users after disk space shortage
By Tom Brewster,
Google has apologised to users of its new social networking service after inadvertently spamming them with notification messages.
The company said a glitch occurred after the Google+ service that keeps tabs on notifications ran out of disk space.
“For about 80 minutes we ran out of disk space on the service that keeps track of notifications. Hence our system continued to try sending notifications. Over, and over again. Yikes,” said Vic Gundotra, senior vice president of social for Google, in a blog post.
“We didn't expect to hit these high thresholds so quickly, but we should have.”
Google was “very sorry for the spam,” Gundotra added.
Google’s so-called Facebook rival has been hit by a few minor snags since it was unveiled towards the end of June.
The most significant problem has not been of Google’s making, but of spammers.
A plethora of phony Google+ invitations were sent out earlier this month, pointing recipients to the Canadian Family Pharmacy rather than the hyped Facebook rival.
Google has also been busy deleting company profiles from the service, but only in preparation for a bespoke business service, expected to launch before the end of the year.
Facebook, meanwhile, has been trying to cement its dominance in the social networking space, adding Skype functionality last week.
You may also like...
Sponsored Links
advertisement
You may also like...
Latest Networking Analysis & Insight
Bring you own device: the $600 question
Inside the enterprise: A recent Cisco report claims bring your own device is gaining support from IT departments. But how much are staff willing to invest in personal technology?
- Interop 2012: Q&A, Saar Gillai, CTO, HP Networking
- Is BT the key to broadband Britain?
- Tencent: the biggest web company you’ve never heard of
- The truth about spam
- Have ISPs finally lost the DEA fight?
- Are you ready to launch IPv6 securely?
- Broadband, pricing and small businesses
- Welcome to the stay-at-home Olympics
- Q&A: Cisco on servers, storage and strategy
Latest Networking Reviews
HP t410 All-in-One Thin Client review: First look
- Swyx SwyxExpress X20 review
- Ipswitch WhatsUp Gold Premium 15
- ForeScout Technologies CounterACT 6.3.4
- ThinPrint Printer Dashboard review: First Look
- TITUS Aware for Microsoft Outlook review
- Windows Phone 7 Mango review: First Look
- Dartware InterMapper review
- Kemp Technologies LoadMaster 3600 review
- Sangfor WANACC M5500 review
advertisement
Most popular
- UK regulator shuts down Angry Birds scam
- Apple iPad 3 vs iPad 2 head-to-head review
- IBM bans use of Siri on iPhones
- Chromebooks: What's gone wrong?
- HP plans massive job cuts
- EMC World 2012: Tucci declares Documentum is here to stay
- Dell EqualLogic PS6100XS review
- Macs and Android under malware threat
- RIM loses its head of sales
- Local fibre broadband needs common standards
Register for IT PRO
You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.






Google+ Spams Users
I would beg to differ with the terminology which Mr. Brewster has used in his article. To use the term "spam" in describing multiple notifications sent out to users is, I think, doing a disservice toward Google+ and tends to contribute a negative bias toward the proposed new service. The term "spam" is widely accepted as unsolicited email intentionally sent to a wide range of users in the hope of personal or corporate gain (a much shorter definition than that which otherwise could be provided). I would not classify multiple emails sent out through technical error to recipients who, through their enrollment in the Google+ service, have indicated that they will receive email from Google. While I do not propose to evaluate the Google+ service based on a comparison with Facebook, I would have thought that a somewhat different choice of words could have told the story without painting Google with the same paintbrush as other true spammers attempting to hawk their product or otherwise get their hands into our pocketbooks.
By jerryguinn on Tuesday Jul 12