Oracle Android damages rejected
By ,
A California court has rejected Oracle's estimate of damages, in the software company's copyright case against Google.
Oracle is suing Google for allegedly infringing patents used in the Java operating environment.
The judge rejected Oracle's claim for billions of dollars in damages from Google, a day after warning both sides that they had taken unreasonable positions in a patent battle over the Android mobile operating system.
But the judge on Friday gave Oracle a chance to come up with new figures, after saying in a testy hearing the day before that both technology giants were "asking for the moon."
Oracle sued Google last year, claiming the internet search company's Android software infringed on Java patents that Oracle inherited through an acquisition of Sun Microsystems in 2010.
The case is part of a wider web of litigation among phone makers and software firms over who owns the patents used in smartphones and tablets: the fastest-growing but most heavily competitive segment of technology hardware, one that Apple jump-started with the iPhone and iPad.
Google cast Oracle's damages calculations as between $1.4 billion (£0.87 billion) and $6.1 billion (£3.75 billion) and had asked US District Judge William Alsup to disallow them. Oracle had called for Google to pay $2.6 billion (£1.6 billion).
Alsup rejected Oracle's damages report in a written ruling on Friday, saying that Oracle had "overreached in multiple ways."
He also left the door open for a potential change in the schedule.
"If Oracle needs to postpone the October trial until it settles on which claims it truly believes are triable, then it should bring a prompt motion to do so," the judge added.
At the hearing on Thursday in a San Francisco federal courtroom, Alsup sharply questioned Oracle attorney Steven Holtzman about Oracle's damages estimate, noting that the expert who crafted it was paid $700 an hour by Oracle and came up with a figure topping $6 billion.
Google, which has maintained that Oracle deserves no damages, declined to comment on Friday's ruling. Oracle spokeswoman Deborah Hellinger declined to comment.
You may also like...
Sponsored Links
advertisement
You may also like...
Latest Security Analysis & Insight
What is your password worth?
Would you be tempted to sell off company passwords for a fee? If not, seems like you're in the minority, acccording to research.
- Macs under attack?
- Intel: security inside
- Are you spending too much on IT security?
- Does the government want to snoop on your data?
- Eurocrats versus the cyber criminals
- The truth about spam
- Google and privacy: What’s the problem?
- Q&A: Symantec’s CISO on the source code hack
- RSA: Back from the breach?
Latest Security Reviews
Check Point 2210 Appliance review
Rating: ![]()
advertisement
Most popular
- UK regulator shuts down Angry Birds scam
- Apple iPad 3 vs iPad 2 head-to-head review
- IBM bans use of Siri on iPhones
- Chromebooks: What's gone wrong?
- HP plans massive job cuts
- EMC World 2012: Tucci declares Documentum is here to stay
- Dell EqualLogic PS6100XS review
- Macs and Android under malware threat
- RIM loses its head of sales
- Local fibre broadband needs common standards
Latest News Videos in Security
IT PRO Podcast: Are UK data protection laws flawed?
We bring in two experts to talk about the problems with UK data protection law and the way it is managed.
Register for IT PRO
You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.





