ITPRO

Printed from www.itpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.itpro.co.uk/reg/register.

The newsletter contains links to our latest IT news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.

Skip to navigation

    Hunt urges end to fibre broadband PIA wars

Hunt points to BT as he calls for an end to bickering over fibre infrastructure.

By Tom Brewster, 15 Sep 2011 at 14:47

Fibre broadband

Culture secretary Jeremy Hunt called for the bitter war between ISPs over pricing of fibre broadband infrastructure to end, during a speech yesterday at the Royal Television Society Cambridge Convention.

Earlier this year, a host of ISPs, including Virgin and TalkTalk, sent a letter to the Government complaining about BT’s pricing of ducts and poles for fibre provision.

They argued BT was charging too much for Physical Infrastructure Access (PIA), yet the telecoms giant said its prices were noticeably less than the European average.

We need to ensure we do not make the same mistake in broadband that we made in railways.

Now Hunt has stepped in, calling for a resolution and indicating he may intervene with Ofcom to ensure progress is delivered.

“The process to reach a satisfactory conclusion on PIA prices for the use of BT’s ducts and poles is taking too long,” Hunt said.

“PIA has to be sorted out – and quickly - in a way that allows fair competition with different providers able to invest in our broadband infrastructure. It’s also important that we have a properly competitive market in retail fibre.”

BT responded to the comments by pointing to a lack of competitor interest in its trials. In an IT Pro special report on fibre from earlier this year, BT was at a loss as to why rivals had not taken part in the trials.

It said the trials would provide real information on how the wholesale fibre process would work – then competitors could make more valid complaints based on the lessons learnt.

“BT was keen to announce new PIA pricing earlier this summer but the trials were delayed due to some companies being slow to sign up,” a spokesperson said today.

“The trials have been underway for some time now and the evidence is helping us revise the related prices so that they are more flexible and tailored to the needs of industry.”

BT is to issue revised prices for duct and pole access in the coming weeks.

Over the weekend, TalkTalk reentered the debate, saying it feared BT was using public funds to assert a monopoly on the fibre industry.

"At all times BT is thinking about how it can recover the monopoly position that it lost many years ago," TalkTalk's group commercial director David Goldie told the Observer.

BT again pointed to its pricing, also noting how it had “provided reciprocal wholesale access to its fibre network from the outset,” unlike other ISPs.

Hunt warned the UK risked getting left behind if more progress was not made.

“We need to ensure we do not make the same mistake in broadband that we made in railways - building our high speed network 45 years after the French and 62 years after the Japanese,” he added.

“I am a strong believer that competition is the biggest driver of investment both at the retail and infrastructure level. But I do not believe the market is working as well as it should.”

Email to a friend

Print this page

< Previous   Mobile : News Next >

1 comments

You need to Login or Register to comment.

BT should be broken up

BT infrastructure should be a separated from the Telecoms side. That way the "noticeably less than the European average" prices they'd be charging, would be the same for everyone.

Telegraph poles should be free to run fibre, as it's such a simple means of running cables. Ducts have a much more limited capacity, but then again, if you ripped out all that useless copper wire, you'd have a lot more space.

If you're wondering why i don't suggest the same thing for Virgin, it would be because of the following reasons:
1. All the cable company's which now come under the banner of Virgin media shelled out vast amounts of cash creating a cable network which BT should have already produced 10 years prior.
2. BT's monopoly allowed it to expand its infrastructure to such an extent that even today, most other telecoms cannot adequately compete. Whereas all companies formed recently suffer heavy competition.

By Ip_aread13a6ed2e on Tuesday Sep 20

0 people out of 1 found this comment useful.

Did you find it useful?

 Sponsored Links

advertisement
advertisement

    Latest News Videos in Mobile

IT PRO Podcast: CES 2011

Play IT PRO Podcast: CES 2011   Play

In the first podcast of 2011, we talk with Adam Griffin of Dell and Barry Collins of PCPro about tablets, the cloud and all the other exciting...

 

    Register for IT PRO

You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.

Sponsored Links
Advertisement