ITPRO

Printed from www.itpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.itpro.co.uk/reg/register.

The newsletter contains links to our latest IT news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.

Skip to navigation

    The problems facing Windows 8

What does Windows 8 need to do to turn around the decline of Microsoft’s operating system? Simon Brew has been taking a look…

By Simon Brew, 21 Oct 2011 at 12:56

Windows 8

Re-energised after the relative success it enjoyed both with Windows 7 and the way it went about promoting the product, Microsoft has taken a bold approach with the next iteration of its market-leading operating system.

From the developer preview that it freely released, it’s immediately clear it’s willing to take a gamble with the shape of Windows 8.

The preview highlighted just how aggressively Microsoft is targeting the tablet market, with the new Metro interface integrated into the operating system. Granted, it’s not new to users of Windows Phone 7, but given the comparably limited market share that OS enjoys, many will be meeting the Metro interface for the first time.

It’s clear that Windows 8 has some sizeable challenges ahead of it.

At heart, Windows 8 is a strong piece of work. Comfortably one of the most customisable and friendly tablet interfaces, Metro allows you lots of flexibility over the placement and size of icons, and it’s intuitive enough to make it suit your preferences with little fuss.

Yet, already, it’s clear that Windows 8 has some sizeable challenges ahead of it. Just what problems does Microsoft need to overcome in order to make the product a success?

Closing Windows?

Historically, Microsoft has been plagued by the fact many businesses aren't keen to migrate to updated versions of its software.

In much the same way that Microsoft struggled to budge people from the likes of Office 97, many organisations saw little reason to invest further beyond Windows XP. Windows Vista, infamously, did little to help matters, and it’s only with Windows 7 that there’s been an upward level of interest and warmth towards the operating system.

Yet it’s not translating as much as Microsoft would desire into cold, hard sales. In the past 12 months, NetMarketShare figures show Windows has surrendered over four per cent of its market share. Each of Microsoft's major rivals is growing in popularity. Windows is still mainly rooted in the desktop market, whereas its strongest competition is far more portable. iOS and Android, for instance, have become massively popular platforms. And the mobility issue is partly what Windows 8 is looking to redress.

But can it? Windows Phone 7 hasn’t shown much encouragement there, and for the first time in a generation, Microsoft has capable competition in this sector. Android, MacOS, iOS and Linux are, to differing degrees, making interesting inroads.

Microsoft has a strong, cemented position in the sector, of course. But, much as Internet Explorer has experienced a decline over a number of years, the problem the Redmond giant faces is that the competition can slowly, bit by bit, chip away at it. A four per cent drop a year, after all, would paint a picture of a very, very different Microsoft a decade down the line.

Doing too much

By incorporating the Metro interface with the traditional Windows desktop, Microsoft has, in Windows 8, an operating system that can scale to phones, tablets and desktops. At least in theory.

In practice, based on the early developer release, it’s got a bit of a balancing act, and not an easy one. Appreciating that the current release is likely to undergo some sizeable changes before the final version of Windows 8, there’s still a big question as to who Microsoft really wants to target with the product.

Previous
1 2

Email to a friend

Print this page

< Previous   Desktop Software : Analysis & Insight Next >

2 comments

You need to Login or Register to comment.

The Problem...

The problem is, Apple, Google and Microsoft are all seemingly ignoring their traditional markets in a headlong rush to tabletify their desktops...

Google, with Chrome, are going for full-screen "web-apps" in a browser window, which might work on a 13" laptop.

Likewise, the 2 big selling points for Lion were "full screen" apps and a launcher which aped the iPad. Great on an iPad, pretty f*****g stupid on a dual or triple 27" set-up. I've seen a few 13" MacBook users saying the full screen mode is good, but I haven't seen 27" Mac or dual-head professional users having anything nice to say about it.

And now Microsoft seem to be going the same way. Metro works very well on their Phone OS. It would work well as a "start" screen, to replace the start menu. But the full-screen mode of Metro apps seems to be aimed squarely at the tablet user.

The whole industry seems to have looked at tablets and gone "ohh, shiny shiny!" Leaving "professional" users out in the cold. So far, nearly every review I've read has talked about how good Metro is on a tablet. I haven't seen a single review that addresses its practicality on a dual big screen setup...

I currently have Outlook, Tweetdeck, Trillian, Skype, 2 x Word and Firefox open on my desktop. I use the right hand side of the left screen as a work area, with the right screen as a reference area and the extreme left for mail and updates. The mail and updates could possibly be reduced to a simple icon level widget, unless I am trying to work on something based on an e-mail... But going "full screen" and losing the ability to have 2 or 3 reference windows visible would cripple productivity.

Given that I have a need to work every day on such a set-up and I have no, current, use case for a tablet, the bias of reporting on Windows 8's ability to work well on a tablet is all well and good, but how is it supposed to work in a real desktop scenario, where users have multiple windows visible?

By big_D on Monday Oct 24

25 people out of 26 found this comment useful.

Did you find it useful?

RE:

@big_D: Couldn't agree more with your analysis. One of the first things I did with the Windows 8 Developer Preview was write a utility to toggle the Metro interface on/off as it's completely pointless on a dual monitor set-up.

We seem to be moving, inexorably, towards consumption-based computing. I bet the developers at Microsoft aren't using touch-screen tablets to develop the OS. And whilst it may be convenient for mobile sales people to stay in touch with HQ using smartphones/tablets, I can't see the back office staff processing purchase orders, invoices, etc. using similar kit.

If MS could make the Metro interface smart enough to be the automatic default on touch-screen devices and the standard Vista/Win7 desktop the automatic default on PCs for grown-ups then it should do quite well.

By MikeGibbard on Tuesday Oct 25

12 people out of 12 found this comment useful.

Did you find it useful?

    You may also like...

 Sponsored Links

advertisement

    You may also like...

    Latest Desktop Software Tutorials

Set up hosted desktops with ThinkGrid

Setting up hosted desktops with ThinkGrid

VDI gives you simplicity at the desktop, but you still have a complex service to manage. ThinkGrid’s hosted desktop service offers a cloud alternative. In this tutorial, Mary Branscombe shows you what you get and how it works.

Read more

 
advertisement
Sponsored Links
Advertisement