The poisonous rootkits rocking the security world
By Tom Brewster,
Rootkits have been around for years. Born in the UNIX world over two decades ago, the term remained a part of UNIX and Linux experts' argot until the mid-2000s.
Thanks to a Sony BMG gaffe in 2005, rootkits entered the lexicon of almost everyone in the tech world. To stop people copying music excessively once installed on Windows systems, Sony ensured users didn't just download tunes when they shoved CDs into their computers, they got rootkits too.
Sony didn't appear to realise the security implications of what they were doing. By installing the Extended Copy Protection (XCP) and MediaMax CD-3 software on user systems, Sony wasn't just invading people's privacy without them knowing. It admitted the rootkit included "a feature that may make a user's computer susceptible to a virus written specifically to target the software."
Things only worsened when Sony issued its rootkit removal tool, which opened up a flaw for other malware to exploit. After all this was discovered, Sony was sued and had to recall the millions of affected CDs.
Once installed, a rootkit acts like a malware invisibility cloak.
It was one of the most significant moments in IT security history. Sony may have settled the lawsuits but the damage was done. The world now knew what rootkits were and what they were capable of. Worst of all, cyber criminals were inspired to create some seriously pernicious rootkits, some of which are leaving security companies whimpering in their labs.
The end game for cyber criminals themselves is simply to evade detection, covering up malicious software doing nasty things to infected systems.
"Cyber criminals are not unlike pickpockets in the real world: they try to remain as inconspicuous as possible, quietly 'working the crowds' as they target other people's property," said Kaspersky senior technology consultant David Emm. "Rootkits are a key part of the cyber criminal's armoury. Once installed, a rootkit acts like a malware invisibility cloak to hide any tell-tale signs that a malicious program is installed."
The classic kernel kits
The most concerning rootkits around today are those that target the OS kernel. "The most advanced rootkits in the wild are still kernel-based rootkits, malicious software that work from inside the operating system," said Marco Giuliani, threat research analyst at Webroot. "They are able to spread in the wild without being blocked by most security software."
The rootkit of the TDL or TDSS malware is one of the nastiest kernel-focused kits around today. Over the past three years, various versions have upped its capabilities to make it incredibly difficult to identify. It is the dark chameleon of the security world, the evil twin of Where's Wally?.
TDL-4 is the latest incarnation. It appeared in mid-2010, able to in infect both 32-bit and 64-bit operating systems, making widely-used versions of Windows vulnerable. The rootkit infects the boot sector, meaning malicious code is loaded before the operating system. To do this, TDL-4 gets into the Master Boot Record (MBR). This is what makes TDSS so stealthy.
You may also like...
Sponsored Links
advertisement
You may also like...
Latest Security News
UK regulator shuts down Angry Birds scam
Victims of fake apps will have £15 charge refunded by PhonepayPlus.
Latest Security Tutorials
How to protect a group of office PCs from viruses
Safeguarding multiple office computers from malware doesn't have to be difficult or expensive, as Simon Edwards shows in our step-by-step guide.
advertisement
Most popular
- UK regulator shuts down Angry Birds scam
- Apple iPad 3 vs iPad 2 head-to-head review
- IBM bans use of Siri on iPhones
- Chromebooks: What's gone wrong?
- HP plans massive job cuts
- EMC World 2012: Tucci declares Documentum is here to stay
- Dell EqualLogic PS6100XS review
- Macs and Android under malware threat
- RIM loses its head of sales
- Local fibre broadband needs common standards
Latest Analysis & Insight Videos in Security
Why security should top the cloud agenda
Security should always be paramount in business, but with a cloud based infrastructure it’s arguably even more important. Steve Cassidy and...






If Mc Affee are owned by Intel why any anti trust?
Whilst I would like to believe this is true - can anti trust issues apply when a company is part of a group rather than a separate entity?
By JamesB on Tuesday Nov 15
ATTN EDITORIAL-WEBMASTER-- BAD FORMAT
Most of us can read an entire article at a time, one a single page. Why attempt to force us to go page-to-page, as though we had an old CRT? It is entirely too cumbersome to page through an article, and consequently, ITPro loses a substantial portion of readers, who yawn and conclude "Why bother?"
By alphaa10 on Sunday Dec 11