W3C standards promise more private web
By Tom Brewster,
The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) has proposed a number of new standards designed to let users know when they're being tracked online.
W3C wants to see companies and browser makers jump on board to make 'do not track' functionality widely available. It also hopes to let users know when websites aren't complying with user privacy preferences.
The first two drafts of the standards - the Tracking Preference Expression and the Tracking Compliance and Scope Specification – were released yesterday.
"Smarter commerce and marketing strategies can and must coexist with respect for individual privacy," said Dr Matthias Schunter, from IBM Research and co-chair of the W3C Tracking Protection Working Group.
"Open standards that help design privacy into the fabric of how business and society use the Web can enable trust in a sustainable manner."
A number of big-name tech companies are involved in the working group, including Apple. The iPhone maker came under fire earlier this year for a tracking function in its phones.
Smarter commerce and marketing strategies can and must coexist with respect for individual privacy.
It has been taken to court by incensed users across the world. Thousands were looking for compensation in South Korea.
A number of browser makers have already sought to include 'do not track' features in their products, including Google and Mozilla, both of whom are also in the working group.
"'Do not track' puts users in control, so they can choose the tradeoffs that are right for them," said Aleecia McDonald, Mozilla Foundation and co-chair of the Tracking Protection Working Group.
"I congratulate the working group members on meeting this milestone and I am delighted by the constructive discussions we have had as we work to reach consensus decisions."
Meanwhile, UK companies are hoping to be in line with cookie laws by 25 May 2012. They will have to gain consent from users before downloading cookie files onto systems and track them.
Those who don't comply with the law could be slapped with a £500,000 fine, although many websites are yet to get in line.
You may also like...
Sponsored Links
advertisement
You may also like...
Latest Security Analysis & Insight
What is your password worth?
Would you be tempted to sell off company passwords for a fee? If not, seems like you're in the minority, acccording to research.
- Macs under attack?
- Intel: security inside
- Are you spending too much on IT security?
- Does the government want to snoop on your data?
- Eurocrats versus the cyber criminals
- The truth about spam
- Google and privacy: What’s the problem?
- Q&A: Symantec’s CISO on the source code hack
- RSA: Back from the breach?
Latest Security Reviews
Check Point 2210 Appliance review
Rating: ![]()
advertisement
Most popular
- UK regulator shuts down Angry Birds scam
- Apple iPad 3 vs iPad 2 head-to-head review
- IBM bans use of Siri on iPhones
- Chromebooks: What's gone wrong?
- HP plans massive job cuts
- EMC World 2012: Tucci declares Documentum is here to stay
- Dell EqualLogic PS6100XS review
- Macs and Android under malware threat
- RIM loses its head of sales
- Local fibre broadband needs common standards
Latest News Videos in Security
IT PRO Podcast: Are UK data protection laws flawed?
We bring in two experts to talk about the problems with UK data protection law and the way it is managed.
Register for IT PRO
You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.





