Google Wallet locked after flaw found
By Tom Brewster,
Google has disabled the use of prepaid cards in its Wallet service after security researchers claimed a flaw in the technology could allow a hacker to acquire the user’s PIN number.
The company temporarily disabled provisioning of prepaid cards for Google Wallet as a precaution until a permanent fix was found.
Despite the action and the research that inspired it, Google claimed its Wallet was perfectly safe to use. It said security issues were more likely to arise if users rooted their phones.
We were able to uncover the contents of the binary data and were shocked at what we found.
“People are asking if Google Wallet is safe enough for mobile phone payments. The simple answer to this question is yes. In fact, Google Wallet offers advantages over the plastic cards and folded wallets in use today,” said Osama Bedier, vice president of Google Wallet and Payments, in a blog post.
“But sometimes users choose to disable important security mechanisms in order to gain system-level ‘root’ access to their phone; we strongly discourage doing so if you plan to use Google Wallet because the product is not supported on rooted phones. That’s why in most cases, rooting your phone will cause your Google Wallet data to be automatically wiped from the device.”
The flaw itself did require root privileges to succeed.
Finding the flaw
Joshua Rubin, a senior engineer with zvelo, claimed to have found the vulnerability in Wallet after looking through a “metadata” table in the database used by Google Wallet.
After cracking open the “deviceInfo” row within that table, he uncovered plenty of valuable information.
“We were able to uncover the contents of the binary data and were shocked at what we found,” he explained in a blog post.
“Unique User IDs (UUID), Google (GAIA) account information, Cloud to Device Messaging (C2DM, also known as “push notification”) account information, Google Wallet Setup status, “TSA” (this is probably related to “Trusted Services” not the “Transportation Security Administration”) status, SE status and most notably “Card Production Lifecycle” (CPLC) data and PIN information.”
Subsequently, Rubin discovered in the PIN information section a long integer “salt” and a SHA256 hex encoded string “hash.” All he had to do then was run a brute force attack to determine the PIN itself.
“It dawned on us that a brute-force attack would only require calculating, at most, 10,000 SHA256 hashes. This is trivial even on a platform as limited as a smartphone. Proving this hypothesis took little time,” he added.
“Google Wallet allows only five invalid PIN entry attempts before locking the user out. With this attack, the PIN can be revealed without even a single invalid attempt. This completely negates all of the security of this mobile phone payment system.”
Rubin said he had been in contact with Google and the company said it was working quickly to resolve the issue.
The researcher suggested Google may have some trouble in releasing a proper fix as it needed to move the PIN hash and salt details into the Wallet’s Secure Element (SE), used to store and encrypt sensitive data like credit card information. This would take time and mean additional financial costs for banks allowing customers to use the service.
“At present, the decision is in the banks’ hands. They may actually choose to accept the risk imposed by this vulnerability rather than incur the financial and administrative overhead of allowing Google to release a proper fix (and thereby potentially put the banks on the hook for the PIN security),” Rubin added.
“zvelo feels that this would be a grave mistake and would expose users to undue risk.”
It appears Google has been given time to resolve the issue.
You may also like...
Sponsored Links
advertisement
You may also like...
Latest Security Analysis & Insight
What is your password worth?
Would you be tempted to sell off company passwords for a fee? If not, seems like you're in the minority, acccording to research.
- Macs under attack?
- Intel: security inside
- Are you spending too much on IT security?
- Does the government want to snoop on your data?
- Eurocrats versus the cyber criminals
- The truth about spam
- Google and privacy: What’s the problem?
- Q&A: Symantec’s CISO on the source code hack
- RSA: Back from the breach?
Latest Security Reviews
Check Point 2210 Appliance review
Rating: ![]()
advertisement
Most popular
- Yahoo CEO resigns after CV debacle
- Apple iPad 3 vs iPad 2 head-to-head review
- Macs under attack?
- HP to bring indestructible plastic displays and Memristor storage to market
- Fusion-IO share price soars on back of Dell merger rumours
- Android users warned of fake app store malware risk
- Dell PowerEdge R820 review
- Is BT the key to broadband Britain?
- What is your password worth?
- Police quiz UK teen over TeamPoison attacks
Latest News Videos in Security
IT PRO Podcast: Are UK data protection laws flawed?
We bring in two experts to talk about the problems with UK data protection law and the way it is managed.
Register for IT PRO
You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.




