Next steps for the data centre
By Mary Branscombe,
In the data centre, power no longer means what you can do with your servers; it's what the bill for plugging them in and running them adds up to. To stop services like shared calendars, software on demand and new Internet tools driving the bills up too far, the industry is looking for a new approach to supplying power.
Big data centres are getting bigger to cope with the consumer demand for Web 2.0-style services; one large US ISP is predicting a fivefold increase in the data they'll serve up over the next five years, which will mean nine times as many servers (and nine times the electricity bill). Enterprises investing in web services, software as a service and remote management are also going to need the servers to support that technology.
It's not unusual to see data centres with 10,000 or even 50,000 processors according to Intel chief technology officer Justin Rattner, and he expects that figure to keep rising. Around five per cent of servers go into what Intel dubs 'mega data centres' today, but by 2010 he believes it will be more like 25 per cent of all the servers sold going into data centres with more than 100,000 servers. And while server virtualisation means you're making the most of your hardware investment, higher CPU usage demands more power to run your servers and more power to cool them.
The capacity of the data centre
Server racks are typically designed to hold servers running at 15 to 20 per cent load. As new usage models mean server load closer to 80 per cent, existing power and thermal management solutions are starting to struggle. If it means new racking, power supplies and cooling, those money-saving data centre consolidations could end up costing more than you'd expect.
As electricity prices continue to increase, paying for power is a significant issue. A data centre with a million servers would need as much electricity as a quarter of a million homes. That's why Microsoft, Google and Yahoo are all building their next generation of data centres close to the hydroelectric power stations on the Columbia River. Short of sticking a wind turbine on the roof, what are your options for managing power costs? Intel, IBM and Google all have some ideas.
Processors that need less power are part of the answer, and cramming more cores into each processor could give you the same performance from fewer blades (because it's not just the processor that needs power). In five years Intel expects to have a processor package with 80 cores. Google distinguished engineer Luiz Barroso warns that "power could essentially overtake the hardware costs if we don't do anything about it"; when Google plotted the cost trends for its data centre it found over the lifetime of a server, power costs more than the original hardware after three years. Barroso wants the industry to look at the whole system; "memory, I/O, cooling and power delivery and conversion as well."
Where the power goes
A typical data centre power supply today delivers a third of the power going through it to your processors; the other two thirds turn into heat you have to pay to get rid of. It's a huge amount, when you consider the average server is rated at well over 300W.
You may also like...
Sponsored Links
advertisement
You may also like...
Latest Server News
HP plans massive job cuts
HP profits fall 31 per cent, as company announces further restructuring.
Latest Server Tutorials
Setting up hosted desktops with ThinkGrid
VDI gives you simplicity at the desktop, but you still have a complex service to manage. ThinkGrid’s hosted desktop service offers a cloud alternative. In this tutorial, Mary Branscombe shows you what you get and how it works.
advertisement
Most popular
- UK regulator shuts down Angry Birds scam
- Apple iPad 3 vs iPad 2 head-to-head review
- IBM bans use of Siri on iPhones
- Chromebooks: What's gone wrong?
- HP plans massive job cuts
- EMC World 2012: Tucci declares Documentum is here to stay
- Dell EqualLogic PS6100XS review
- Macs and Android under malware threat
- RIM loses its head of sales
- Local fibre broadband needs common standards





