Seagate to add built-in hardware security to hard drives
By Guy Matthews,
Storage hardware maker Seagate has taken the wraps off its DriveTrust, technology which it claims will protect data at the hardware level of the hard drive.
A drive protected by DriveTrust will require anyone accessing it to de-encrypt its data with a password or key. Without a password, a hard drive would be useless, says the manufacturer.
Seagate says its new technology differs from most information security which either sets up a firewall around networks or encrypts data at file or operating system level.
Locking up the actual drive where the data sits is a major innovation which will become an industry standard copied by other vendors, claims Seagate.
If it delivers what Seagate claims, DriveTrust could help to end the steady stream of headlines about lost laptops yielding up critical data to hackers and thieves. Sensitive corporate and government data has regularly ended up in the public domain, for instance forcing the authorities to change plans for last month's Labour Party conference at the last minute after an unsecured computer was taken from a parked car.
"A single incident of data theft can have an enormous effect on a company through financial and legal costs, negative publicity and customer defections," said Scott Shimomura of Seagate's global product marketing team. "Compliance with legislation depends on technologies like encryption as a way to help mitigate these risks."
Securing data on the hard drive is an innovative yet commonsense approach that could well simplify data security, says Charles Kolodgy, research director of security products for analyst group IDC. "As storage and security converge, solutions like Seagate's DriveTrust Technology are providing organizations with the easy-to-use security they need to protect their data assets," he added.
Seagate is reportedly considering allowing other storage companies to integrate DriveTrust into their own lines, whilst it offers development tool sets so that third parties can create additional security layers for the technology.
You may also like...
Sponsored Links
advertisement
You may also like...
Latest Security Analysis & Insight
Who to trust after the VeriSign hack?
Davey Winder questions what data was stolen from VeriSign and wonders why the company hasn't been more forthcoming.
- Striving to solve the security skills crisis
- Would you employ a hacker or malware writer?
- Q&A: Raj Samani, CTO McAfee
- Erase and rewind: the EU and privacy
- My email address is [CENSORED]
- Is there such a thing as a secure tablet?
- 2011: The year in news
- BYOD: Old or new, good or bad?
- Are the cookie laws crumbling already?
Latest Security Reviews
Check Point 2210 Appliance review
Rating: ![]()
advertisement
Most popular
- Google releases Chrome for Android beta
- Will someone rid me of these troublesome Macs?
- OneNote hits Google?s Android
- BlackBerry Bold 9790 review
- Google sends in Bouncer to sort out malicious apps
- Ubuntu vs. Windows 7 on the business desktop
- Who to trust after the VeriSign hack?
- Head to Head: Mac OS X 10.7 Lion vs Windows 7
- ACTA: the basics, the controversies, and the future
- BT considering Ofcom price cap appeal
Latest News Videos in Security
IT PRO Podcast: Are UK data protection laws flawed?
We bring in two experts to talk about the problems with UK data protection law and the way it is managed.
Register for IT PRO
You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.





