Skip to navigation
   
Asavin Wattanajantra's Blog

Symbian and Nokia goes for Spotify

By Asavin Wattanajantra in Editorial

Posted in Symbian, Spotify, Nokia on November 23, 2009 at 5:32 pm

Permalink | Author Profile

There might be a few happy Nokia, Sony Ericsson and Samsung owners today with the news that one of our favourite music services in Spotify is now available for them.

This is a pretty big and important event for Spotify, which has to look at its mobile service as being key in its goal of making money. It’s already out for iPhone and Android, but Symbian has a much bigger market share and could mean many more will pay the £10 a month fee.

But will they?

A while ago, I was raving about Spotify as a service and was very much looking forward to seeing the music service on my iPhone, and believed that I would potentially pay the fee.

But I haven’t, and this is in common with a lot of people who really like the service, but weren’t prepared to spend money on it.

With me there is one big reason, and that is a failure of my phone rather than the service. I have an iPhone and the problem is that it only runs one application at the time, unless it’s iTunes.

This is a big problem.

Spotify is built towards music, and for me music is something I listen to while doing something else - such as browsing the internet.

Because of sandbox nature of the iPhone, I can’t do this. Which makes the app pointless because I’m always doing something with it, and going to another program cuts the music.

Apple knew it, and was why it allowed the app. 

So it’s not worth the money for me, because I will rarely use it. Sure, the £10 would cut the ads and give me better music quality, but I’m cheap. I won’t pay something regularly that I will rarely use.

Will it being on Nokia be a success?

It’s difficult to say, but as I mentioned many more people have these phones then they have iPhone or Android. What I am really worried about now when it comes to Spotify is its ability to make money, and whether enough people will be willing to pay the monthly charge.

I mean, there are lots of songs on Spotify now and that must mean money for the record companies. If Spotify doesn’t make this back then I don’t know how it’s going to survive, and that would really suck - especially as I use it at home so often!

12345
Not yet rated
Loading ... Loading ...

 

   
Tag cloud

smartphone Nintendo Digg BERTI government hackers Terminator SQL injection replies hack World of Warcraft alibi Christmas tool PR Fraud broadband paranoia old school crime legal sony playstation Nintendo Sega Sinclair Spectrum gaming Mario Sonic mobile Friendfeed David Blunkett James Bond Klingon alcohol flexible working spam multimedia satnav Beijing NHS downloading internet Facebook feed news Scrabble Hitwise research IT PRO flashmob Daily Mail swear words Kindle robots Mafia Wars worm uSwitch Dark Market data breaches music sightings brainwaves bendy surveillance social media traffic crime map Google Black Hat Republicans update phishing military instant messaging cyber crime pirate Google Street View MMORPG Pirate Bay Mario Spotify privacy morph lapto illegal Steve Jobs pride Star Trek opinion browser vote Google offline pod casting Farmville status trend micro filters control remote working streaming flaw death video Microsoft Digital Britain DNS Sega teenagers medials Second Life hatred human clones science Google Reader Olympics Firefox journalism malware Flurry IM FBI iPhone fire Sonic Google Maps tech fun RSS top ten tips Twitpocalypse university of portsmouth Sophos virtual worlds kill password ASA Bill Gates Apple nokia Lewis hamilton poking funny Wherecloud eBooks Kaminsky YouTube ducks video games Cisco unlimited ENISA app BlackBerry DNSSEC murder staff future credit card data cybercrime software rickrolling hacking brain Amazon Twitter growth RPG Clampi website Transformers Mozilla ID cards phone hype
Advertisement
Advertisement