Skip to navigation
   
Dave F's Blog
Alcohol ‘irrelevant’ in rape

By Dave F in Reader

Posted in In the news, Men and Women on August 12, 2008 at 8:59 am

Permalink | Author Profile

http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_7555000/7555600.stm

We need to ask what is the ethos of the criminal injuries compensation fund. If it is akin to a insurance scheme that pays out to when we have been injured then there is every case for reduced payments to those who have placed themselves at greater risk. I fully agree that to be considered to be “to blame” for being raped (or mugged) is offensive and plain wrong however in terms of compensation some allowance for risks taken may be appropriate. My insurance will not pay out if I leave my car unlocked although the crime is still not justified. In fact I have to pay a higher premium because I am guilty of not owning a garage!

There is also the issue of psychological consequences. Many victims suffer because they no longer feel safe in the situation they were in. If the consequence is the victim no longer leave the house even in daylight this is a more severe situation than if the victim can no longer walk down dark alleys drunk.

These are general points and are not directed to the woman in the case referred to especially as she claims not to have been drinking to excess!

I also have to question the use of sex discrimination law. As this policy applies to all forms of attacks how is sex discrimination used when young men are by far the highest target of violence?

12345
Not yet rated
Loading ... Loading ...

Previous Post | Next Post

 
 
Comments
This article has no comments yet.

Make a comment

* required

* required

We stop spam using reCaptcha.
Type the words below and click Submit Comment.

Advertisement