Skip to navigation
   
Davey Winder's Blog

Are you a thieving Firefox user?

By Davey Winder in Editorial

Posted in Firefox on August 20, 2007 at 5:01 pm

Permalink | Author Profile

I am not going to suggest that advertising revenue is not important in the overall web business model scheme of things, for a huge swathe of such enterprises it is vital. But suggesting that using ad-blocking technology within your web browser client is tantamount to theft is just daft. Not as daft as blocking anyone who uses the Firefox client because it comes with some rather effective ad-blocking technology built in, mind you, but daft nonetheless. The fact that one site has done both is shockingly stupid.

Take a look at whyfirefoxisblocked.com and you’ll see what I mean. Sure, it could all be some kind of elaborate hoax. Reverse psychology marketing perhaps, suggesting that Firefox users are the scum of the earth and detailing a (very primitive) way of blocking access to them, all to stir up media attention and get some free advertising (no pun intended) for the Mozilla browser.

Somehow, I doubt it though. I am inclined to lean more towards it being a genuinely ridiculous campaign by the hard of thinking. And here is why…

“Software that blocks all advertisement is an infringement of the rights of web site owners and developers” claims the site, continuing “accessing the content while blocking the ads, therefore would be no less than stealing.” OK, they have a point so far, and the ethical approach would be not to visit a site and make use of that content if you are unwilling to take the advert rendering alongside. Indeed, this is pretty much what I practice. If a site provides quality content, gives me access to a resource that is valuable, then I will happily put up with some unobtrusive advertising. IT Pro falls nicely into this category as far as I am concerned. I disable ad-blocking on a site-by-site basis where I believe the content deserves it. However, where a site is geared towards feeding me adverts, filling their coffers in the process but without any worthwhile content or user experience alongside then the adverts are blocked. That is called freedom of choice, and unless there is a specific legal requirement which stipulates I must not block ads in order to access the site, I don’t think I am doing anything wrong.

Then again, I don’t think that site owners who try and prevent access by people using blocking software is wrong either. Na

12345
Not yet rated
Loading ... Loading ...

Previous Post | Next Post

 
 
Comments

Trackback by Billy Prejsnar - February 9, 2012 on 5:29 am

greenpeace jobs canada…

[…]really a usually instance is virtually all houses should the mothers want to consider its kids exterior for any […]…

Make a comment

* required

* required

We stop spam using reCaptcha.
Type the words below and click Submit Comment.

   
Tag cloud

Trousers carbon copy sick scareware CAPTCHA Gadget Study library banking Project Firefox fun Google Earth meme Apple hardware Google Flash development service man-in-the-middle global shopping Obama theft Jesus Phone virus Kill Switch law crime MessageLabs Children Digital Footprint iPhone 3GS Mafia HP admin Battery Android Top 10 Beta iPhone 3G rootkits prison GMail computer Health report security black hat Eee PC chips Licensing malware Ballmer Meh Silverlight iPhone Microchip Video exploit YouTube Eee Networks trust Retail ROFL digitise Jobs e-commerce payments stupidity Mobile Phone Netbook documentation computers betting China office Software fake ecommerce Election spending Dell Harry Potter surveys iPad technology mobile ISP credit crunch Olympics USA Spotify support privacy books social networking earth hour PS3 Palm Pre Backlash biometrics Rumour Marketing dumb copyright nightmare debian recession Browser Army computing campaign Web Development web 2.0 scan hacker environment Johnny Depp code Apps Psychic Facebook Digg Enterprise McKinnon Nintendo OCR OS help hacking Texas Instruments data Military archiving tax Tesco Linux adware hubdub phishing lawsuit Hack Pirate Experiment data protection Rant Kaspersky productivity App Store banks Adobe parental control teleworking worker Game Microsoft Geeks Press universe IBM Top 500 Mobile Phones migration Porn network remote Government Internet snooping Bill Gates scam Intel Music ISPA Developers workplace Lotus Gartner Death Trojan home IDC standards credit card fraud Cisco President poll SSL patch management search iPod policy monetisation Gateway family BOFH Twitter Zango Scotland Deal Kin hypervisor virtual machine broadband Big Brother management students transactional security Windows 7 InfoSec Steve Ballmer IT Funny AMD virtual world Recall e ASUS Opinion Programming School Nexus Blogging news Acer BSI Parenting GSM size Energy console IP spam worm Steve Jobs symantec services statistics Conference App Addiction The Federation survey Blog fool Madness Psion science VM Analysis Banned Media christmas Yahoo Windows fraud VeriSign memory Vista innovation Performance computing green world of warcraft second life encryption Finjan Paris Hilton Europe Architecture web Palm games tech economics desktop Sex RATM payment server outsourcing Sony gadgets patent terrorism ID Theft NASA Application Amazon Windows Phone 7 Series email open source EU SMS RAM Voice staffing Kindle Russia virtualisation Business gaming MSNBC Supercomputer storage information botnet millions Patents politics avatar Employment Research compromise NBC smartphone XP remote working Browsers Data Centre Mars football museum MSN work VPN Guardian graphics Internet Explorer DNS acquisition Review hoax holidays eBook MiniBook Education money linkedin Noro FBI HPC Michael Jackson Advertising wifi stupid cloud mail Texting economy Notebooks Space printing xmas disclosure
Advertisement
Advertisement