Skip to navigation
   
Davey Winder's Blog

The UKIP approach to data security

By Davey Winder in Editorial

Posted in Cloud, Business, Data Protection, Government, Security on April 15, 2010 at 1:48 pm

Permalink | Author Profile

Just how much does the average Brit hate Europe? Ask them about data security in the cloud and you’ll find out.

Size does matter, and the bigger it gets the harder it becomes to remember where you put it. I’m talking about data storage and the data stored within it, in case you wondered. The findings of a poll published by the Business Software Alliance (BSA) on its third European Cyber Security Awareness Day in Brussels reveal that the majority of European citizens not only don’t know where their online data is being stored but they are less than certain whose job it is to protect that data, wherever it may be.

I kind of know the feeling. I have plenty of network attached storage, so much that only a few years ago I would have had to have been Bill Gates to afford it. I even have my own personal cloud thing going on courtesy of the rather nifty Pogoplug which I like to think of as my little bit of pink Linux data fluffiness. However, the fact that I have huge amounts of data stuffed onto huge amounts of storage doesn’t mean I know where it is. Indeed, if it were not for some seriously smart local search software I’d never remember exactly where I put anything, especially if I had put it there a few years ago. Documents are not a problem, I know where they are as I keep a copy of everything I write on a heavily encrypted USB stick which I carry with me at all times, with a further encrypted back up stick stored away for good measure.

Luckily, I also know where the buck stops when it comes to securing all the data: that would be with me. I run my own business, it’s my responsibility to look after the data it generates and do so in a secure fashion. But what about data generated about you by someone else, and stored ‘in the cloud’ as everyone, including my elderly mother, likes to say these days? back to that BSA survey, and 60 percent of those asked didn’t actually know what ‘in the cloud’ means, including my mother had she been asked, funnily enough. What’s more, 1 in 5 were unaware if their personal data was being held there or not.

What two thirds did know, or at least agree upon,was that responsibility for securing data held ‘in the cloud’ lay outside the businesses that actually use the data. Most agreed that there was a need for some kind of international handling of cyber security rather than an individual national approach to the problem. Spain on 77 percent and Poland on 74 percent were most enthusiastic about an international approach to data security, with most other Europeans being broadly in agreement with the concept. Apart, that is, from us Brits. Despite recent calls by the House of Lords for just such greater involvement by the EU and increased cooperation with NATO on matters of cyber security, only 46 percent of us increasingly isolated islanders thought it was a good approach.

The BSA is preparing a global cyber security policy framework to guide this notion of international cooperation to secure the online environment, and its senior director of government relations, Francisco Mingorance, insists “most Europeans are looking for global leadership and collaboration to protect their personal information from hackers and cyber criminals”. I guess that most Brits just don’t consider themselves to be European, at least when it comes to online data security matters. Either that or the BSA just happened to be questioning a bunch of UKIP supporters.

12345
Rated: 100% (1 votes)
Loading ... Loading ...

 

Will OpenDNSSEC secure the Cloud for business?

By Davey Winder in Editorial

Posted in Business, Cloud, Data Protection, Blog, Security, Internet on February 12, 2010 at 10:04 am

Permalink | Author Profile

The rapid advance of the cloud, along with other existing Internet-based services, into the business space has highlighted the need for trust in the underlying protocols that provide the driving force behind the Internet. Some are now arguing that a secure software-based DNS signing system is essential if business is to maximise the potential of the cloud.

With the release of OpenDNSSEC, software under a BSD licence which helps simplify the process of creating and managing DNSSEC signatures, that goal could have got a little nearer. Not least as the software can be downloaded and installed on existing systems, without interfering with existing infrastructures, and used to quickly set up and provide a secure DNS service without hassle.

What is DNSSEC do I hear you ask? Well DNSSEC essentially secures the data used to translate domain names by the addition of a cryptographic signature to that data and so providing proof that the query has not been modified in transit. This is increasingly important as the bad guys start targeting the data in DNS caches which, without such measures, is now hugely vulnerable to attack. OpenDNSSEC has been developed as an open-source turn-key solution for DNSSEC to secure zone data just before it is published by effectively taking in unsigned zones and adding signatures and other DNSSEC required before passing it on to the authoritative name servers for that zone.

Natalie Booth, organiser of the 360°IT infrastructure and security conference, is a fan of the open source initiative. She reckons that by allowing site owners and operators to download the OpenDNSSEC software, the open source initiative is paving the way for a new generation of Internet software and browser add-ins that uses this important new technology. “360°IT welcomes the release of the open beta of this BSD licensed software and expects to see a flurry of software arriving in the coming months that advances what looks like being a major evolution in Internet security” Booth says.

12345
Rated: 100% (1 votes)
Loading ... Loading ...

 

Microsoft reveals time-based licensing model

By Davey Winder in Editorial

Posted in Cloud, Business, Blog, Windows, Microsoft on October 11, 2009 at 9:47 am

Permalink | Author Profile

It is always worth keeping an eye on patent applications from the bigger players in IT as they have the potential to reveal possible future business models long before any official statement.

In the past Microsoft has been held up for ridicule with some of the patent applications it has made. Perhaps most notable amongst these was the infamous Page Up Page Down patent. The latest Microsoft patent application to reach my radar will not, most likely, cause quite the same amount of sheer disbelief although it does point to something of a change in the way the Seattle giant sells us software and services.

Microsoft has filed for a patent for ‘Time-Based Licenses’ and the application abstract reveals this to be a method and system for “issuing a number of different types of time-based licenses associated with software products”.

The technical stuff about the system including an activation server which might maintain licensing information in a licensing database, along with a licensing platform which may might request issuance and renewal of time-based licenses, is interesting enough. But not nearly as interesting as the statement that each of the time-based licenses may be associated with respective product keys and may have a number of configurable parameters to make time-based licenses suitable for different licensing business models. Microsoft says, in the patent application, that licensing business models could include “a non-renewable evaluation license, a renewable trial license, a one-time promotion license, and a subscription license” as well as “a configurable parameter” which indicates “an amount of time for a grace period after a time-based license would have normally expired”.

I’m not sure how well this is going to go down with folk who are used to paying for their software with a single, one-off, license. Does this application reveal that Microsoft is going to get serious about Software as a Service after all? However, as we get increasingly comfortable renting our applications (anti-virus being a prime example) and increasingly comfortable with our software being in the cloud, it is surely only a matter of time before that includes the OS. Anyone prepared to wager if Windows 8 will be the first OS for hire from Microsoft?

12345
Rated: 80% (4 votes)
Loading ... Loading ...

 

Inflated expectations in the security cloud

By Davey Winder in Editorial

Posted in Cloud, Business, Data Protection, Blog, Security on September 21, 2009 at 12:06 pm

Permalink | Author Profile

I don’t think that anyone with an eye on the future could seriously dismiss ‘the cloud’ as not being right up there as far as game-changing business technologies go. However, that doesn’t mean that the services are not suffering at the hands of over-exposure and hype right now.

IT powerhouses have, it would seem, been happy to jump aboard the cloud hype bandwagon in what some have described as being an all puff and no trousers move.

While I would not dream of suggesting for one moment that cloud-based security services do not have the potential to be really important players as far as the next few years are concerned, I would have to agree with the Gartner overview that they have yet to deliver on customer expectation. I’m thinking in terms of delivering managed firewalls to the enterprise, distributed denial of service protection services and antivirus for example.

According to the latest Security Related Hype Cycles report, in the cloud security services have hit an inflated expectations peak this year. Ray Wagner, a Managing VP at Gartner, explains that in the cloud security services made the top of the list courtesy of a combination of limited successful implementations coupled with unrealistic expectations. “Cloud security providers must deliver on customer expectations for the effectiveness, scalability and cost savings of performing security filtering in the cloud or as a service” Wagner says, concluding that “the small or midsize business is an appealing initial market for these delivery models at lower price points, and we expect that the technology will become mainstream within two to five years”.

Why should anyone care about whether cloud security is on this list? Well, looking back it would appear that those technologies that do rise to a ‘peak of inflated expectations’ level on the hype cycle list tend to pretty soon end up reaching a tipping point whereby they are left on the wrong side of that hype peak, and users are left disillusioned with the technology.

In other words, maybe it is time to stop with all the ‘next big thing’ hyperbole from the cloud service providers and instead time to start giving the technology a chance to talk for itself. Do that and corporate users might just discover that there actually is something to be said for consolidating premises-based security into a cloud-based delivery model after all. Surely the cloud has, by now, gone past the ‘too early in the development cycle to be worth evaluating’ stage even if it has not, at least when we are talking security services, reached a stage of maturity where it can be said to be capable of delivering competitive advantage.

As my late father used to say “don’t jump in with both feet unless you’ve measured the water depth first” and, as usual, he wasn’t wrong.

12345
Rated: 100% (1 votes)
Loading ... Loading ...

 

   
Tag cloud

patch management SSL banking Olympics School virtual machine Zango Cisco worm computing e-commerce Palm Gateway encryption biometrics Top 500 economy help Gartner Analysis NBC report BOFH Retail scareware Death ISPA Guardian Paris Hilton Meh Government Texas Instruments worker games trust Finjan size work network Harry Potter Apps Intel IDC acquisition hubdub campaign science hoax innovation Acer Employment Porn graphics millions IT Enterprise debian Jesus Phone Psychic Battery PS3 Digg BSI second life survey spending Space statistics development Rumour Conference Performance computing information Linux malware Top 10 NASA Marketing students prison console politics Europe fraud Lotus iPhone 3GS archiving credit crunch Internet Big Brother symantec Scotland service football computer transactional security ROFL Steve Ballmer law Recall Hack poll FBI IBM Ballmer hacker YouTube smartphone EU tech Jobs ecommerce virus Apple botnet Nexus Trojan Mobile Phone mobile Texting Addiction Psion Rant HP xmas Army code Eee PC Deal Firefox Netbook Johnny Depp MSN Nintendo technology Digital Footprint Video spam OS Backlash Notebooks Project services global surveys Noro holidays printing books Browsers App Silverlight wifi sick office hardware black hat nightmare standards Advertising data email SMS Funny hacking search desktop social networking GMail stupidity scam Blogging OCR Palm Pre documentation staffing Windows 7 Education Vista Bill Gates payment server Election Amazon computers christmas linkedin Google management Microchip fake Pirate Steve Jobs chips man-in-the-middle iPhone 3G fool Parenting MiniBook Trousers CAPTCHA Microsoft broadband RATM Data Centre privacy Gadget iPhone Experiment Game environment fun policy Networks phishing Architecture Application eBook iPod Michael Jackson hypervisor payments Review AMD world of warcraft HPC meme support museum betting Sony InfoSec remote admin green Patents ID Theft theft Kill Switch remote working open source workplace China terrorism Twitter family memory DNS ASUS Music Mars Web Development Licensing Programming Sex Adobe Dell Russia exploit banks Windows Phone 7 Series gadgets storage Eee Press Software virtual world outsourcing economics Google Earth security VM Health home compromise USA McKinnon scan Tesco Blog virtualisation news disclosure MessageLabs universe copyright monetisation Military GSM Kin crime productivity Business Study Kindle credit card fraud gaming Windows Yahoo dumb Research Supercomputer VPN cloud Developers VeriSign Mafia teleworking Browser parental control ISP The Federation stupid migration Geeks web Flash library Voice Facebook Mobile Phones Energy XP lawsuit mail earth hour IP recession data protection digitise money MSNBC iPad Android e Media Beta web 2.0 rootkits snooping Madness adware Banned shopping tax Spotify Internet Explorer avatar President RAM Obama patent carbon copy App Store Children Opinion Kaspersky
Advertisement
Advertisement