QuarkXPress 8, abridged too far?
By Mark Tennent in Reader
Posted in QuarkXPress on August 7, 2008 at 11:50 am
Three hundred quid to upgrade from QuarkXPress 7 to 8 is ridiculously too expensive. Especially as QuarkXPress 6 users can get the same deal and in return a far better piece of software than the one they are using at the moment.
Don’t take this the wrong way. Quark made incremental changes to XPress that, arguably, leave inDesign in the shade. The latter seems ideal for one-spread-wonders but a slow, buggy and clunky tool for real desktop publishing. It’s not without reason that the UK book industry is still largely wedded to XPress.
The latest version of XPress is available as a free download that functions for a full 60 days. It is well worth a test, especially for those Luddites still using QuarkXPress 6. On-screen display of text alone makes the upgrade to XPress 7 or 8 an immediate must-have.
Abridged too far?
Also in QXP 8 Xtensions such as the XPert Tools suite and Quark’s Interactive Designer introduced in XPress 7, are now fully integrated into the program. Many of the features are old hat to inDesign users but for Quark, box styles, Flash export and the like are new toys. For some reason Quark did not include all the features from XPert Tools, many of the most useful are missing: multiple-page pasting, scaling groups and layout settings, for example.
Where QuarkXPress 8 really scores is in new typographical features. This includes new styles for hanging indents, something inDesign has had for years, and more sophisticated vertical alignment. This is very important when text contains in-line objects or type that is larger than the text surrounding it. Until now they would all line up to their baselines but XPress 8 can control how they align, whether from the top, centreline or baseline. No excuses now for ugly vertical spacing.
The Good and the Ugly
Comment by davesofnj - August 7, 2008 on 7:52 pm
>know how bad Adobe
Comment by - August 8, 2008 on 7:44 am
Can’t post a snippet but in the past when I’ve typeset books, using both the optical and metrics options, inDesign has a nasty habit of squeezing word and letter spacing too far.
Then, more recently, converting inDesign CS3 files to QuarkXPress 7 using MarkzTools, the file transfer perfectly but the state of Adobe’s typesetting is revealed when you compare the same text set in inDesign with it set in XPress. Again, it’s the letter and word spacing. The same when converting XPress files to inDesign, the text XPress 7 is clearly a better set when comparing them.
Quark reworked their type engine in XPress 7 and it’s a huge amount better than before.
Comment by John Nolan - August 8, 2008 on 9:43 pm
You do know that one can vary the word and letter space to one’s tast in InDesign,don’t you?
If the letter spacing is too tight in InDesign, it’s because someone set the parameters poorly. One can’t really blame InDesign for that.
Comment by - August 9, 2008 on 8:44 am
Yes I know about setting the spacing. But with long text runs - books - it can all be fine apart from the occasional paragraph and that usually doesn’t show up on screen, or not enough to notice.
I switched back to XPress when 7 came out but have to keep a foot in both camps which is blinking expensive.
Trackback by - April 19, 2010 on 9:42 pm
wholesale slippers…
Wholesale Suppliers China PVC Crystal Slippers,EVA Slippers,Rain Boot,PVC Slippers,PVC Air Blowing slippers….
Comment by Andolasoft - June 24, 2011 on 10:42 am
Thanks for such a great post and the review, I am totally impressed! Keep stuff like this coming.
Trackback by - February 9, 2012 on 3:47 am
will smith scientology school…
[…]all options put before him ahead of he handed down his demise sentence to […]…
Trackback by - February 9, 2012 on 8:09 am
will smith biography…
[…]making it 13 victories from 13 races – mentioned of her decision[…]…
Make a comment
Tag cloud
Archives
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
Most commented posts
Highest Rated Blog Posts
- Blinking Cursors (100%)
- iPhoniness (100%)
- Relevant eloquent pleading (100%)
- Frozen in Time Machine (100%)
- Moondrop to Agony (100%)
- Coding Monkeys and a Hat full of Sky (100%)
- Grrrr Growl (100%)
- Chasing the dragons (100%)
- It just sits there dribbling (100%)
- And the Winner is… Who cares? (100%)


