Employees are our most valuable asset (snigger)
By Simon Bisson & Mary Branscombe in Editorial
Posted in Applications, Enterprise, Business on
Actually, if you’re read your Dilbert, you’ll know that’s not true and it’s really photocopiers; employees come in around number nine on the list (and a copier manufacturer once sent me the statistics to back it up).
But number one or number nine, your employees are the source of your business’s knowledge and ability; you may think you have business processes but it’s your employees who actually get things done (often by entirely different methods). So what technology are you using to manage that asset and how much more can you get out of it?
HR isn’t just there for the nasty things in life; if you use it properly, HR could be a repository for useful information about the skills in your organization, the candidates who turned you down but might be worth approaching again in a year’s time - and when the most people will be out of the office, if you’re trying to pick a good time for a major network upgrade. The HR team knows when new employees will start work; you could get the manager to ask the IT team to order them a PC while the facilities team books a desk and a phone line - or you could have a system that does it automatically when HR enters the day they’ll start work.
You need to know when people actually make it to work, when they’re on holiday, ill or just AWOL. Do you let them enter that into the system themselves, or have them fill out a form, show it to their manager and send it on to a third person to put into the system? Sounds like an obvious choice but according to Chris Berry, MD of HR automation specialists Computers in Personnel, efficiency isn’t what a lot of companies are thinking about. At one large company that he’s too polite to name, when Berry suggested an automated system employees could use directly, the head of HR told him they couldn’t consider it; after all, what would the 50-strong admin team do then?
You can’t leave everything up to employees; there have to be checks and approvals for some processes. But there are plenty of approvals that can be automated as part of a workflow without taking up two people’s time. If I’m putting in an order through a purchasing system and it’s under my sign-off level then it shouldn’t need to be countersigned. If I want to update my bank details, I shouldn’t have to mail it to someone who prints of the email, hands it to an admin and has it typed in ‘to make sure it’s right’. I’m motivated to give you the right details in the first place, because I want to get paid, and if I get them wrong, I’m motivated to come back and correct them - or I don’t get my money. And if I’m using a self-service system, the form can have validation built in so I have to type in a sort code with six digits; you can’t do that in email!
It’s joined up business; not only do you save on admin time and get more of your data right first time, you’re bringing another layer of information into systems where you can analyse it. Usually we think about upgrading technology to make a server or application run better rather than because it’s slowing individual employees down; but if you could see that you get more transactions through a
Rated: 100% (1 votes)
Loading ...Comment by - April 10, 2008 on 3:28 pm
Interesting article about HR from an IT perspective. I have that Dilbert cartoon on the homepage of my website!
Interested in your comment about ‘HR is not just there for the nasty things in life’ - what did you have in mind?
Comment by - April 10, 2008 on 11:25 pm
Well, as per Yellow Pages, many people think of HR for unblocking drains (say, the exit interview) or fixing broken windows (formal warnings). HR is never going to be a single source of truth for everything about employees - I have much more of an incentive to keep the finance team up to date when I change my bank account - but they should know enough about employees to be a valuable resource and the business should put that resource into the IT mix.
Why did the HR team at the company I mention not spot how many managers were about to retire? I bet facilities know when the contract for cleaning the office will need renewing… Why is the HR team not the first port of call for gathering the expertise network for the business? There are so many things HR ought to contribute, but most people think of HR for hiring and firing and nothing in between.
M
Comment by - April 11, 2008 on 10:13 am
Couldn’t agree with you more about using the HR system to provide information for workforce planning. This then provides HR with an opportunity to demonstrate its value by working with managers to put in place a plan to address the issues raised. This doesn’t happen enough in my view.
Your reference to Yellow Pages is interesting too - and emphasises the usual reactive role that HR gets stuck in, often preventing the proactive stuff like workforce planning from being done!
I think the problem is that many people (and organisations) are not clear what HR is there for, so everyone has a different viewpoint. This makes life difficult for everyone - managers, employees and HR. So clarity of role (and training for managers)are the answer in my view - and a good HR system of course!
Comment by Mike - December 11, 2008 on 11:49 am
Informative post. I was searching for some information on onboarding and other human resource policies. Really got what i was looking out for.
Comment by louis vuitton outlet - May 31, 2010 on 1:21 am
I like writing, hurriedly, not that you are not
www.louis-vuitton-outlet-store.com
Make a comment
Tag cloud
Archives
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
Most commented posts
- Java's SSVAGENT.EXE: training the monkey
102 comments
- When Windows 7 upgrades won’t hibernate (the solution)
- Do you need IPv6 for DirectAccess? Yes and No
- Chrome OS: what happens when "always connected", isn't?
- The ColdFusion Renaissance
- There’s a reason smartphones are locked down
- Is there a showstopper bug in Windows 7 CHKDSK?
- The LHC isn
- At sixes and Windows 7s
- Make Adobe Acrobat Pro deactivate
Highest Rated Blog Posts
- Songs of distant satellites (100%)
- Nobody knows what Web 2.0 really is (100%)
- Log in and lock in (100%)
- Top tips for speeding up Vista (100%)
- Mommy, why is there a home server in the office? (100%)
- Employees are our most valuable asset (snigger) (100%)
- Locking down IT or blocking creativity (100%)
- Consumer BlackBerrys are good for business (100%)
- HD Trek (100%)
- Join the (beta) community (100%)
