Size is everything
By Mark Tennent in Reader
Posted in Uncategorized on March 12, 2007 at 12:06 pm
Most men never believe the old chestnut that size isn’t everything. But now Pfeiffer Consulting have the evidence to prove them wrong.
They examined large screen, high definition monitors, in particular the Apple 30-inch Cinema HD display, an object of lust for many a designer. Pfeiffer found there are definite gains in productivity and the return on investment can be paid off over the period of a year or even less. The complete 30-inch Apple Cinema HD Display Benchmark Report can be downloaded at www.pfeifferreport.com.
I’m of the generation who started “real” computing on the old Amstrad Joyce with it’s little green and black screen, before moving via the Atari Mega STs to a Mac which came with a brilliant (for 1990) 13-inch colour display. My colleagues bought even larger screens that were hideously expensive and had lower resolutions than today’s laptops.Their fronts looked like the curvature of the earth, moving the mouse from top to bottom saw the pointer travel in an arc and ending up “underneath” somewhere.
For years I stuck with 17-inches, enough for any man, surely? But then a job involved designing A3 landscape pages and 840mm spreads just wouldn’t show up large enough. An Apple 23-inch Cinema screen came to live on my desk and I realised the error of my ways. Bigger is better, more productive and easier on the eyes for just about any computing task. That’s exactly what Pfeiffer found as well.
Productivity and efficiency gains were measured and found to increase significantly for users of the display, in office applications as well as for digital imaging and design. Users changed their work strategies to incorporate the screen real estate and ended up working in ways that would be impossible on smaller screens. This is something I can vouch for, especially with the new wide-screen format, compared with the old 4:3 ratio.
LCD screens are also a lot easier to use because they have a stable image and whiter whites. Whenever an LCD users returns to an old cathode ray-tubed screen the first thing they notice is the display’s flickering caused by the scanning of the CRT gun.
Modern computers allow multiple applications open all the time, each often with many windows. They can fit side-by-side on a wide screen enabling easy access to them all. Pfeiffer found dramatic time differences between screen sizes. For example: applying selective formatting in large spreadsheets on a 17-inch screen took nearly double the time taken on a 30-inch one.
Application palettes are also an essential part of our work, on smaller screens closing and hiding them to see behind all takes time. Pfeiffer measured exactly how much this cost, when opening and closing palettes takes up to 10 seconds. Repeated 100 times that adds up to over 15 minutes wasted. If that’s time lost by a highly paid accountant or director, purely because they cannot see enough information on screen at one time, the extra costs of larger monitors are soon regained. A benefit I must remember next time I want a new screen.
Finally, one thing Pfeiffer didn’t look at is the effect on games. If the game can handle it and your video card up to it, games look absolutely brilliant.
Make a comment
Tag cloud
Archives
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
Most commented posts
Highest Rated Blog Posts
- The difference between a Parapedal and a Pedalflanger (100%)
- CrushFTP 4 (100%)
- CD Ripping Rip Off (100%)
- Another Ripping Rip off (100%)
- That'll fool 'em (100%)
- A bad Tool always blames the browser (100%)
- Reasonably priced car hit by star (100%)
- 10.5.3 and Time Machine (100%)
- Carbon Dating (100%)
- Rough Wiis do shake the darlings (100%)

