Skip to navigation
   
Mark Tennent's Blog

Sourcerer’s apprenticeship

By Mark Tennent in Reader

Posted in utilities on March 12, 2008 at 3:20 pm

Permalink | Author Profile

A long, long time ago, when Mac users ran System 6/7/8/9, windows were things you looked through. Apart from version 3 (and lately Vista) which for some weird reason was installed on generic computers, with the reasoning they were the equivalent of IBM’s Mac’s and Sun’s fancy GUI operating systems.

In those old times, way before the turn of the century, open source software was not something Mac users needed. There were one or two little programs, many still around today and some which weren’t even open source but free software provided by their publishers out of the goodness of their hearts. Such as Adobe Type Manager to render Postscript fonts, Stuffit for stuffing, Netscape and others for browsing. Meanwhile, the rarified atmosphere of *nix-based operating systems seemed totally reliant on free software, largely because there wasn’t much else.

What a change has taken place since then. Nowadays, governments and industry have already switched or are thinking of using an increasing amount of free, open source software. Usually this is driven by their need to drop the enormous fees charged for licensing proprietary suites, such as Microsoft’s many offerings. Sometimes it’s because there is no alternative. The arrival of the Asus Eee, complete with GNU/Linux and Elonex’s sub-£100 Linux powered laptops are showing that Microsoft will need to reconsider its marketing strategy. It’s closed systems cost far more than a laptop complete with OS and applications for much of the tasks the average computer user needs. Especially in the light of the National Laptop Initiative which could see Microsoft locked-out of future generations completely if schools adopt open source operating systems.

Others such as Apple, usually considered the expensive option, have started to look increasingly cost-effective as many essential elements are built-in for free with no pay-per-seat charges. There is only one version of Mac OS X – the full monty including mail, web and ftp servers, software development tools and so on. In addition, there are the vast libraries of Unix software, much of which will run on Mac OS X under Apple’s X11 X Window System, an optional install on the System disks.

What’s on offer?
It is perfectly possible to run with only free open source software and still be able to swap files to and from mainstream applications. Microsoft’s Office is replicated by NeoOffice, which is often more reliable than the real thing. Adobe’s Photoshop and Illustrator can be supplanted by Gimp, Seashore and Inkscape; QuarkXPress or InDesign replaced with Scribus. While these tools are for designers, just about any other task is covered by open source and shareware rather than paid-for and often extremely expensive applications.

Where do you get it?
In addition to the usual Mac download sites such as Versiontracker and Macupdate, both of which are worth checking regularly, we use two main sources for free software and shareware. The first is Apple’s own site and the largest library which also contains updates, demos and paid-for/shareware. The software has all been tested by Apple - with no guarantees.

apple-open-source.png

The second library, Opensourcemac is far smaller than Apple’s but all of the software has been given a thorough work-out by Mac users and represents that which they consider to be the best in the field.

opensourcemac.png

Give them a look and it’s guaranteed you’ll spend an hour or two downloading new tools, games and add-ons.

12345
Rated: 100% (1 votes)
Loading ... Loading ...

Previous Post | Next Post

 
 
Comments

Comment by Jacques Daviault - March 20, 2008 on 2:43 pm

I think open-source software is, for the most part, a great idea. There are some real gems out there, but for every gem you find on Source Forge, for example, there are 10 unfinished dogs. Wretched attempts at imitating more polished commercial software, or an obscure bit of bytophilia (my word) that serves a purpose so specific, and is aimed at an audience so narrow that it becomes nothing more than a curiosity piece and of little real use. Then there’s the countless abandoned projects. Littering open-source download sites are the bloated corpses of half-baked projects that were dead ends before they started. Unsupported by developers with ADHD, or that are unable to stir up any interest and hence recruit others to labour away on them, in hopes that masses will accomplish hat amateurism cannot. Leagues of code-babies tinkering with every last call and resource until the project is complete. Open-source is great, at least in theory. But to many average users, the notion that they might have to compile a project for their machine is uninviting, at best. I say make an effort at forcing open-source sites to remove the propellor beanie hat and “they will come”. Or, at the very least, have a storefront for the average Joe, like me, to visit and peruse, and download software that is finished, and actually works.

One last thing… when will makers of small commercial software STOP calling their products “shareware”? Why this definition should have changed over the last 2 decades escapes me. Shareware used to be freeware, but now only freeware is freeware, and shareware isn’t free. Semantics can be frustrating, but commerce can be downright stupid. As if calling it “shareware” is about to fool me into thinking that the money I’m about to pay isn’t real money. Idiots…

Still, I did enjoy your article Mark. Well done, as usual.

Make a comment

* required

* required

We stop spam using reCaptcha.
Type the words below and click Submit Comment.

Advertisement
Advertisement