Skip to navigation
   
Mark Tennent's Blog

Rough Wiis do shake the darlings

By Mark Tennent in Reader

Posted in Gripes moans and whinges, Images on June 18, 2008 at 12:28 pm

Permalink | Author Profile

According to a survey by Sheila’s Wheels insurance company, 20% of female Wii users have caused an average of £6.55 damage to themselves or their property, adding up to a total of £20.1 million. The most common injury is pulling a muscle during energetic Wii-ing and some have even ended up in hospital.

Apart from showing that men can manage their enthusiasm more economically, when they get to the hospital with their injured partners the blokes can oggle some of the new cool IT kit  the NHS has got in recent years. Gone are dusty cathode ray tubes, in are gleaming LCD screens and increasingly, small rechargeable hand-held devices. Where once an electrocardiogram required a separate room full of StarTrek gadgets, now a nurse grabs a self-powered box, it’s octopus of leads taking up more room than the printer and ECG machine combined. What next, Bluetooth or would that be Orthodontics only?

NHS finances
It is also suspicious that when one goes to an hospital appointment made for a specific time, you seem to be kept waiting ages for your ‘turn’. Then, after 5 minutes or so with the doctor, going back to the car park shows you have exceeded the nearest hour and so move onto the next charging level. Could it be that the Health Service are deliberately holding you back? They enhance their finances through the extra car park charges generated by delay. You arrive back at your vehicle just a few minutes past the hour, so maximising both their parking fees and the efficiency of the car park.

This is a little like paid-for software updates that give minimal extra features but enough to make you reluctantly buy into them. Unless they are Adobe Photoshop ones. Eighteen years ago we had software capable of rotating a 2 bit line-art image by an arbitrary amount, something Adobe still haven’t achieved in their premier image editor. Scanning in line-art is always a chore because it’s almost impossible to get the scan exactly square. Older software such as Linocolor Elite was able to align the image before scanning but that was in the days of System 9 and not continued into Mac OS X, a great loss.

Artefacts, Whistles and Bells
Making a cut-out is still a case of drawing a clipping path and pulling bezier curves around the object – hair being the worst – or painting a quick mask and converting it to a path. Adobe gave us a few extra tools that are supposed to help but in reality, they are little better than the magic wand. They would do well by concentrating more on making the simple things easier to achieve rather than all the whistles and bells recent upgrades have introduced.

The standard of today’s digital images are usually worse than those taken by a cheap disposable film camera. Lens aberrations can be so bad the edge of an object is hidden in multi-coloured anti-aliasing made worse by jpeg compression artefacts. Lately we’ve been doing books such as the History of Guitars and currently the History of Snipers, both full of cut outs. By the time we reached Zemaitis guitars we longed for a bass because they only have 4 tuning nuts to draw around. And as for the twin necks played by Led Zep’s Jimmy Page and Eagle’s Don Felder… For at least for a month or so afterwards we become total nerds and can spot the difference between a Rez-o-Matik and a Humbucker, a dumdum and a spitzer.

And which art is more lively and less a template, (at the risk of making ‘him’ turn in his grave for such ugly paraphrasing.)

12345
Rated: 100% (2 votes)
Loading ... Loading ...

Previous Post | Next Post

 
 
Comments

Comment by Jacques Daviault - June 18, 2008 on 3:40 pm

You’re certainly covering a lot of topics… too many to elicit a comment from me other than you’ve got a wicked sense of humour. But that’s no surprise is it.

Comment by Mark Tennent - June 18, 2008 on 3:51 pm

Is that because you love Illustrator so much, you… Adobephile?

Comment by Jacques Daviault - June 18, 2008 on 6:48 pm

Illustrator is great. After all, if you prefer to do design with your Freehand then you’ve got a few problems, and you’re not a red-blooded he-man.

I learned on Freehand waaaaay back in 1988-89, and was “switched” to Illustrator. But you know the whole story so I won’t bore you with it here. You’ll eventually find all those quint novelty tools that you loved in Freehand incorporated into Illustrator, so not all is lost.

Truth be told, had I continued in Freehand after 1989 I’d probably be a blind disciple, like you. Not that I’m a blind follower of Illustrator… oh hold on, I must run. Illustrator CS3 needs me.

Comment by Mark Tennent - June 18, 2008 on 6:59 pm

I had to search deep inside my hard drives to find Freehand. Don’t need it nowadays since QuarkXPress, inDesign and Photoshop got bezier curves, layers, transparency and so on. QuarkXPress 8 will be very interesting with its enhanced Illustrator-alike features.

Comment by Jacques Daviault - June 19, 2008 on 8:02 pm

I’d love to have Quark 8… but I can’t afford another mortgage. Plus, I purchased Adobe CS 3 (Photoshop, Illustrator, InDesign and Acrobat Pro) for 1/2 the price of Quark. No matter if Quark is 20% better than InDesign, it’s not 20% better than half the price for 4 great applications.

That being said, I’d still love to have it.

Comment by Mark Tennent - June 19, 2008 on 10:41 pm

Hmmm. Not sure about the prices you pay in Canada but it looks like in the UK QuarkXPress 7 is about £800 and Adobe CS3 is £1600. Granted there are a lot more elements to CS3 but two or three of them wouldn’t be needed (Acrobat, Illustrator and inDesign).

Plus there is the Adobe ‘tax’ they have taken a liking to in the last five years. Adding the CS2 and CS 3 upgrades onto the cost of the original CS1 elements compared with Quark’s version 6 to 7 upgrades with, say, the cost of one version of Photoshop and Illustrator (which do the same job as their CS3 versions) and you have a massive saving. I know because I’ve had to keep a foot in both the Adobe and Quark camps.

Comment by Jacques Daviault - June 20, 2008 on 3:49 am

I purchased Adobe CS3 for $400 (£200), then again the education discount helped. Without the educational discount it retails at £800 for the full edition. £1600 seems rather steep. Quark 7 retails for £400 here.

The price differences are surprising, and I really didn’t expect such a large one between North America and Europe.

Comment by Mark Tennent - June 20, 2008 on 7:25 am

Wow! I might just be able to get a CS3 upgrade for £400. But then Britain is called “Treasure Island”. When the dollar to pound ratio is at 2:1 we should be paying a hell of a lot less for our software here.

Comment by Jacques Daviault - June 26, 2008 on 5:39 pm

I agree, which is why the U.K. pricing really seemed inordinately high.

Make a comment

* required

* required

We stop spam using reCaptcha.
Type the words below and click Submit Comment.

Advertisement
Advertisement