The browser wars are over. HTML has lost.
By Simon Bisson & Mary Branscombe in Editorial
Posted in Enterprise, Web browser, Adobe, Internet, Microsoft on
With Firefox 3 around the corner, and IE 8 in beta, perhaps its time to call this round of browser wars over before they’ve begun. Adobe’s put a line in the sand today with the beta of Photoshop Express, and there’s no way a pure HTML/CSS/JavaScript browser can ever cross it - no matter how much of ACID3 it can render.
Why?
Microsoft and Adobe are pushing innovative web application development outside the browser into cross-platform runtimes that deliver everything that Java promised. HTML is obsolete, and all we really need is the <object> tag.
One of the big announcements at Microsoft’s web development conference Mix08 was the public beta of Silverlight 2. It’s another salvo in the developing rivalry between Microsoft and Adobe. Both companies are treading on the same path as they struggle to find direction in the developing software as a service world. Adobe’s made its latest step today, with a Flash-based in-browser version of Photoshop built using its Flex platform. Both companies are targeting developers with their rich internet applications strategies, offering platforms for next generation web applications that go beyond the limitations of HTML and web browsers.
Silverlight 2 is Microsoft’s first cut at a high-performance in-browser rich internet application platform. Flash may well perform well if you’re using the Flash 9 player, but noit everyone writes well-architected Flex applications, and the Flash/Flex designer/developer dichotomy is a tricky one to deal with. Not everyone can write an application like Photoshop Express, and the capabilities of Flash are being lost in a morass of advertising animations that mean a lot of influential users block Flash from their browsers completely…
Microsoft is watching Adobe carefully, and it’s trying not to make the same mistakes. While Silverlight is designed to be used by advertisers (and comes with plug-ins suitable for most analytics platforms), it’s also developer friendly. Install Silverlight 2 and the Silverlight 2 SDK and you’ve suddenly got a tool that lets you write C# code that runs at desktop speeds inside a browser - and on Macs as well as Windows boxes. There’s no point in codeing for a host of incompatible browsers if you can target a plug-in that’ll work across a sizeable set of your target userbase.
You’re going to need to write code if you’re planning on using Silverlight in anger. Deep Zoom, one of the Mix 08 Silverlight announcments, may only take a line of code to implement in your XAML - but you’ll need a lot more in the associated code to actually work with browser, mouse and keyboard to actually handle the zooming… Microsoft is a developer-focused business, and even though its attempting to redress this with its Expression family of tools, you’re going to need Visual Studio to get the most out of Silverlight.
Photoshop Express is a good idea - and a powerful tool. Could you build it in Silverlight as well as Flash/Flex? The answer’s quite simple: Yes. It’d probably run faster too, as Silverlight has a threading model that’s not there in the current generation of the Flash player. This time next year, well, who’s to say. Flash 10 will have probably changed the game yet again. One things certain: you couldn’t build it in HTML.
There’s something for everyone in the competing RIA platforms. That’s a good thing, as it’ll mean better user experiences for everyone - and a step back from the current round of browser wars. Meanwhile Microsoft and Adobe wil take competition outside the browser and into the development platform. The next step, well that’s most likely to happen where it’s needed most - server side.
–Simon
Not yet rated
Loading ...Comment by Alan Ralph - March 29, 2008 on 8:39 am
I would not say that HTML has ‘lost’ - in reality, it will go back to fulfilling its original purpose, the dissemination of information online, with help from CSS.
The attempts to push HTML into an application platform, by stirring in Java, Javascript, AJAX et. al, were hamstrung at first by the limitations of the browsers, then by the security flaws that they exposed. It is only within the last few years that ‘Web 2.0′ has become workable across a majority of browsers and OSes, but even so only a minority of websites have actually bothered with it.
A case in point, from my own experience - deviantART has embraced Web 2.0 in a big way to extend the functionality of its art and print uploading system, its print shop and other areas, but the IT and creative teams behind the site have had to code different levels of support for different browsers, according to how well they support CSS and Javascript.
Make a comment
Tag cloud
Archives
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
Most commented posts
- Java’s SSVAGENT.EXE: training the monkey
5 comments
- Wubi Tuesday
- Not very open, not very social
- The best mobile game ever
- A Big Day In The Enterprise IT World
- Employees are our most valuable asset (snigger)
- Biometrics - it's not the technology that's broken
- More battery life, fewer explosions
- Spam Fighting in Exchange
- IDF: Will SSD mean the end of 5GB free?
Highest Rated Blog Posts
- Nobody knows what Web 2.0 really is (100%)
- Songs of distant satellites (100%)
- Log in and lock in (100%)
- Mommy, why is there a home server in the office? (100%)
- Employees are our most valuable asset (snigger) (100%)
- Locking down IT or blocking creativity (100%)
- Video opera? What would you do with huge bandwidth and millions of pixels? (100%)
- Consumer BlackBerrys are good for business (100%)
- HD Trek (100%)
- Top tips for speeding up Vista (100%)