Facebook users easily fooled by thieving frog
By Rene Millman,
Users of social networking sites have been warned that they are at risks from ID thieves if they reveal too much information about their lives.
Anti-virus firm demonstrated the problem by setting up a fake entry on popular social networking site Facebook. The company invented a profile page for "Freddi Staur" with minimal information about himself and sent 200 friend requests to random people on the site to see how many would respond to a stranger and what personal information could be teased out of respondents.
The experiment revealed that 87 people responded to requests by a stranger (albeit one that used a picture of a cute frog toy as a profile picture) and 82 of those people divulged personal information about themselves. Another 72 per cent of the 200 revealed one or more email addresses and 84 per cent listed a full date of birth. It also discovered that 78 per cent listed their current address or location and 23 per cent gave out their current telephone number.
For the majority of cases, the experiment was able to gain access to photos of friends and family, as well as users disclosing the names of spouses and even putting complete CVs online. One respondent even divulged his mother's maiden name - this information is often used by websites in order to retrieve account details.
"What's worrying is how easy it was for Freddi to go about his business. He now has enough information to create phishing emails or malware specifically targeted at individual users or businesses, to guess users' passwords, impersonate them or even stalk them," said Graham Cluley, senior technology consultant at Sophos.
"Most people wouldn't give out their details to a stranger in the street, or even respond to a spam email, yet several of the users Freddi contacted went so far as to make him one of their 'top friends'."
Cluley said that people need to realise that this is still unsolicited communication, despite it occurring within Facebook, and users must employ the same basic precautions - such as not responding in any way - "to prevent exposure to wrongdoers."
You may also like...
Sponsored Links
advertisement
You may also like...
Latest Security Analysis & Insight
What is your password worth?
Would you be tempted to sell off company passwords for a fee? If not, seems like you're in the minority, acccording to research.
- Macs under attack?
- Intel: security inside
- Are you spending too much on IT security?
- Does the government want to snoop on your data?
- Eurocrats versus the cyber criminals
- The truth about spam
- Google and privacy: What’s the problem?
- Q&A: Symantec’s CISO on the source code hack
- RSA: Back from the breach?
Latest Security Reviews
Check Point 2210 Appliance review
Rating: ![]()
advertisement
Most popular
- IBM bans use of Siri on iPhones
- Apple iPad 3 vs iPad 2 head-to-head review
- Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Ultrabook review : First look
- Chromebooks: What's gone wrong?
- HP plans massive job cuts
- Google: Government controls are the internet's biggest threat
- Macs and Android under malware threat
- Sony Vaio T13 Ultrabook review: First look
- RIM loses its head of sales
- ARM-based Windows 8 tablets facing delays
Latest News Videos in Security
IT PRO Podcast: Are UK data protection laws flawed?
We bring in two experts to talk about the problems with UK data protection law and the way it is managed.
Register for IT PRO
You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.





