IT departments can't quantify security risks
By Rene Millman,
Nearly half of IT departments have no idea whether security risks are increasing or decreasing, according to a new report.
The research by Vanson Bourne of over 1,000 UK IT directors and CIOs found that 46 per cent of IT teams were unable to quantify risk to organisations from security threats. The study found that 60 per cent of CIOs and IT directors classed network security as their top priority.
When asked about their ability to measure and report on network security risk, 51 per cent said this was possible. While 38 per cent of financial services companies, responsible for handling consumer data, admitted to being unable to measure network security effectively. 20 per cent of these senior IT professionals didn't know if they can perform this basic level of reporting.
The study found that 45 per cent of respondents say their companies are taking longer than a month to compile information for regulatory compliance, despite this being the top priority for 25 per cent of organisations - 37 per cent in large organisations (3,000+ employees). This represented an improvement over last year's timescales (60 per cent of companies took over a month and 26 per cent up to three months).
But the research shows that UK companies are still falling far short of best practice with 30 per cent who cannot say with confidence how long it takes to compile compliance data.
"CIOs and IT directors that embrace the benefits of effective security risk management reporting will create better, faster and safer businesses," said Kevin Lamb, Director of EMEA Operations at nCircle, the company that commissioned the survey. "As well as the direct positive impact on business risk, organisations stand to benefit from reduced operational and compliance audit costs."
He said that a company that has real-time information has more risk control and higher efficiency levels than one that is taking three months to compile data.
You may also like...
Sponsored Links
advertisement
You may also like...
Latest Security Analysis & Insight
Who to trust after the VeriSign hack?
Davey Winder questions what data was stolen from VeriSign and wonders why the company hasn't been more forthcoming.
- Striving to solve the security skills crisis
- Would you employ a hacker or malware writer?
- Q&A: Raj Samani, CTO McAfee
- Erase and rewind: the EU and privacy
- My email address is [CENSORED]
- Is there such a thing as a secure tablet?
- 2011: The year in news
- BYOD: Old or new, good or bad?
- Are the cookie laws crumbling already?
Latest Security Reviews
Check Point 2210 Appliance review
Rating: ![]()
advertisement
Most popular
- Will someone rid me of these troublesome Macs?
- BT considering Ofcom price cap appeal
- Google sends in Bouncer to sort out malicious apps
- Anonymous publishes FBI hacking call
- ACTA: the basics, the controversies, and the future
- Virgin 100Mbps rollout 'ahead of schedule'
- Who to trust after the VeriSign hack?
- Head to Head: Mac OS X 10.7 Lion vs Windows 7
- VeriSign admits 2010 hack
- What should RIM do to recapture the attention of businesses?
Latest News Videos in Security
IT PRO Podcast: Are UK data protection laws flawed?
We bring in two experts to talk about the problems with UK data protection law and the way it is managed.
Register for IT PRO
You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.





