Why do people tolerate Twitter frailties?

Twitter’s service performance levels seem to attract less criticism that most. But why is that, wonders Simon Brew?

We once read a letter in a computer magazine from a disgruntled end user who wasn't happy with the service he was getting from Microsoft's Hotmail webmail system. He argued that the service had gone down for a couple of hours and left him without email, and that this was the second time in seven years that this had happened.

The reply from said magazine sensibly suggested that two drops in service in seven years is an exceptional record. Yet it nonetheless highlighted intolerance in people's approach to web services, which is in itself of course a symptom of how much we rely on them.

After all, what's most people's reaction to losing their Internet connection for a day or two? It's outright panic in some cases. And in business in particular, there's clearly often really good justification for that, for very obvious reasons.

The exception?

Twitter, however, is the exception to the rule, it seems. Because certainly over the past couple of years, Twitter has endured its fair share of performance problems.

It's less common now, but the "Twitter is over-capacity" screen, or fail whale as it has been dubbed, was a fairly regular occurrence once upon a time, and as the service has had to deal with very dramatic growth in recent years, there are further moments where it's felt like it's creaking to keep going. In fact, Twitter has admitted that there are some deep-rooted problems that it needs to address in the months ahead to properly correct some of the ongoing issues that the service's massive growth has thrown up.

And yet quite possibly more than with any web service on the planet, Twitter's performance problem is accepted. It's taken as part and parcel of using the service, and even though it's arrested many of its performance issues, it still has its moments.

Most recently, in preparing a service upgrade in time for the expected surge in demand for the service during the World Cup, Twitter hit several bumps. There were duplicate posts, posts disappearing, and periods where it simply wasn't possible to do any kind of update at all. Granted, there was frustration. But the rampant rage that any tech support person can tell you about when a computer system hits problems? Strangely absent. Not entirely, granted, but it was a far more muted response than you might expect for such a popular service.

Featured Resources

2021 Thales cloud security study

The challenges of cloud data protection and access management in a hybrid and multi cloud world

Free download

IDC agility assessment

The competitive advantage in adaptability

Free Download

Digital transformation insights from CIOs for CIOs

Transformation pilotes, co-pilots, and engineers

Free download

What ITDMs did next - and what they should be doing now

Enable continued collaboration and communication for hybrid workers

Recommended

IT Pro News In Review: Cyber attack at Ikea, Meta ordered to sell Giphy, new Twitter CEO
cyber security

IT Pro News In Review: Cyber attack at Ikea, Meta ordered to sell Giphy, new Twitter CEO

3 Dec 2021
Jack Dorsey resigns as Twitter CEO
business management

Jack Dorsey resigns as Twitter CEO

29 Nov 2021
Tesla shares fall after Musk Twitter poll
business management

Tesla shares fall after Musk Twitter poll

8 Nov 2021
Twitter sells mobile ad unit for triple its original value
Acquisition

Twitter sells mobile ad unit for triple its original value

7 Oct 2021

Most Popular

What should you really be asking about your remote access software?
Sponsored

What should you really be asking about your remote access software?

17 Nov 2021
How to move Microsoft's Windows 11 from a hard drive to an SSD
Microsoft Windows

How to move Microsoft's Windows 11 from a hard drive to an SSD

24 Nov 2021
UK and Singapore align closer on digital trade
Policy & legislation

UK and Singapore align closer on digital trade

1 Dec 2021