The battle of Apple and Google subscriptions

Two different models and two different philosophies, but which of the US giants will win out?

A fight is brewing between two Goliaths: Apple and Google. The cause of the dispute? Being the first to come up with a system convincing publishers and readers of the viability of paid content online.

But will the move cure the terminally ill press and music industries, for whom this might be the last opportunity for salvation, or will it be the final thrust that finishes them?

Apple rocks the cart

Bitter reactions didn't take long to arrive when Apple launched its new subscription system for content apps earlier this month.

Advertisement - Article continues below
Advertisement - Article continues below

Complaints focused on three supposed major issues with the system, which applies to newspapers, magazines and producers of online streaming audio and video content.

On one hand, Apple's decision to keep 30 per cent of the revenue was something many publishers didn't like. Nor were they too happy with the fact that the new system required publishers to offer subscriptions within their apps for the same price or less than they offer them elsewhere including their own websites.

Another aspect that seems to have ended the honeymoon between Apple and online content publishers was the Cupertino company's strategy of keeping the very valuable consumer information for itself, instead of sharing it with publishers.

Speaking out

The first to react was music streaming company Rhapsody, which responded directly to Steve Jobs' firm in a statement saying the new subscription system would generate an "economically untenable" situation.

Rhapsody said it would not just be able to offer its service through the iTunes store if subjected to Apple's 30 per cent monthly fee, and reminded Apple credit cards also usually keep 2.5 per cent of transactions.

Advertisement - Article continues below

Rhapsody announced it would consult lawyers and look into the matter whilst seeking cooperation from market peers to challenge Apple's subscription system, both in court and from a business perspective.

When contacted by IT PRO, Apple had no comment to make about Rhapsody's accusations, or the announcement that legal actions might be be around the corner.

Along the same line, Steve Purdham, chief executive of We7 - Rhapsody's competitor - said the music subscription market was to become "economically unviable." Richard Jones, co-founder of, also expressed a similar opinion.

Although the most successful of online streaming companies, Spotify declined to comment when IT PRO contacted it for a response to the situation.

Advertisement - Article continues below

However, Ben Dury, CEO of 7digital, claimed Spotify risked being derailed by Apple subscription charge.

In an interview with the Daily Telegraph, Dury, whose company is an online music retailer and Spotify partner, said if Apple forced its new subscription service to the likes of Spotify, it will be impossible for subscription music to stay on the Apple platform.

Featured Resources

What you need to know about migrating to SAP S/4HANA

Factors to assess how and when to begin migration

Download now

Your enterprise cloud solutions guide

Infrastructure designed to meet your company's IT needs for next-generation cloud applications

Download now

Testing for compliance just became easier

How you can use technology to ensure compliance in your organisation

Download now

Best practices for implementing security awareness training

How to develop a security awareness programme that will actually change behaviour

Download now

Most Popular

data governance

Brexit security talks under threat after UK accused of illegally copying Schengen data

10 Jan 2020
cyber security

If not passwords then what?

8 Jan 2020
web browser

What is HTTP error 503 and how do you fix it?

7 Jan 2020
Policy & legislation

GDPR and Brexit: How will one affect the other?

9 Jan 2020