Apple vs. Samsung: Android 3 does not violate patents

A judge rules Samsung Galaxy phones will have to stop selling via The Netherlands, but Android 3 might come to the rescue.

Android

A Dutch court has banned the sale of a number of Samsung Galaxy phones, although the company may be able to get around the injunction with software updates.

Yesterday, it emerged the court had banned sales of three Samsung Galaxy phones in a number of European countries, but only because of an infringement of one Apple patent.

Advertisement - Article continues below

Today's ruling is an affirmation that the Galaxy range of products is innovative and distinctive.

That patent, which relates to a photo scrolling function, would not be infringed by Android 3, otherwise known as Honeycomb, according to reports.

The ban on the Samsung Galaxy S, the Samsung Galaxy S II and the Ace would come into force from 15 October.

Samsung therefore has to add Android 3 to those devices, or change the software so it does not infringe the photo scrolling patent, if it wants to be able to sell them across Europe.

As for the other patents being fought over, the judge did not uphold several of them, including claims Samsung had stolen design ideas from Apple.

The Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 was not affected by the court ruling either.

Samsung welcomed the judgement, appearing convinced it would only affect Dutch customers, reports found.

Advertisement
Advertisement - Article continues below

However, as industry onlookers have noted, Samsung uses the Netherlands to import most of its devices into the EU, meaning the injunction would prevent sales in other European nations, including the UK.

Advertisement - Article continues below

"Today's ruling is an affirmation that the Galaxy range of products is innovative and distinctive," Samsung said in a statement.

"With regard to the single infringement cited in the ruling, we will take all possible measures including legal action to ensure that there is no disruption in the availability of our Galaxy smartphones to Dutch consumers."

As the patent infringement was related to Android issues and was upheld, it could mean Apple has grounds to take court cases to other competitors across Europe.

Featured Resources

Staying ahead of the game in the world of data

Create successful marketing campaigns by understanding your customers better

Download now

Remote working 2020: Advantages and challenges

Discover how to overcome remote working challenges

Download now

Keep your data available with snapshot technology

Synology’s solution to your data protection problem

Download now

After the lockdown - reinventing the way your business works

Your guide to ensuring business continuity, no matter the crisis

Download now
Advertisement

Recommended

Apple hit with $1.4 billion Siri patent infringement lawsuit
Policy & legislation

Apple hit with $1.4 billion Siri patent infringement lawsuit

3 Aug 2020
Apple acquires startup to turn iPhones into payment terminals
Technology

Apple acquires startup to turn iPhones into payment terminals

3 Aug 2020
Big tech CEOs grilled by House Judiciary Committee’s antitrust panel
Policy & legislation

Big tech CEOs grilled by House Judiciary Committee’s antitrust panel

30 Jul 2020
Apple is under investigation for alleged deceptive practices
Policy & legislation

Apple is under investigation for alleged deceptive practices

24 Jul 2020

Most Popular

How to find RAM speed, size and type
Laptops

How to find RAM speed, size and type

3 Aug 2020
Labour Party donors caught up in Blackbaud data breach
data breaches

Labour Party donors caught up in Blackbaud data breach

31 Jul 2020
How do you build a great customer experience?
Sponsored

How do you build a great customer experience?

20 Jul 2020