HP reaffirms commitment to Itanium and HP-UX

Exec reacts defensively to speculation that HP might drop specialist Intel processors.

COMMENT It hasn't been a good year for HP. Besides all the furore over the change of CEOs and the very public indecision over webOS and its PC division, it has also gotten into controversy over Intel's Itanium server processors. HP has called on European regulators to investigate Oracle's decision to drop Itanium from its servers a move which it has publicly criticised as against customer interests and even sued its rival in the Californian courts.

Despite this surprisingly frank, public criticism of a major rival, HP itself helped cast doubt on the future of Itanium by announcing Project Odyssey. This initiative is supposed to replicate some of the advantages of HP-UX, the company's Unix-based operating system that runs on Itanium-based HP servers handling business critical tasks, in Windows or Linux running on servers using standard X86 processors.

Why would you make that inference that because I announce support for X86 that I'm less committed to Itanium? I'm very committed to Itanium!

We caught up with Martin Fink, Senior Vice President and General Manager of HP's Business Critical Systems unit, at the HP Discover event in Vienna and asked him whether Odyssey was a sign that HP was de-emphasising Itanium for its customers.

Advertisement - Article continues below
Advertisement - Article continues below

He strongly refuted this saying "You're making a statement that because I support X86, I can't support Itanium! But Oracle supports the X86 platform, but they still push SPARC and they haven't deemphasised. IBM pushes X86, but still push POWER and they haven't deemphasised. Why would you make that inference that because I announce support for X86 that I'm less committed to Itanium? I'm very committed to Itanium! It's a very common thing in the industry to support X86 and a proprietary hardware."

Fink added "our competitors have two completely separate families of computers. In the case of IBM, X86 and Power. We have one infrastructure which everything goes into. This is so much better for customers because they can deploy one infrastructure and can fill half of it with Itanium and half with X86. They can't do that with IBM or with Oracle."

Featured Resources

What you need to know about migrating to SAP S/4HANA

Factors to assess how and when to begin migration

Download now

Your enterprise cloud solutions guide

Infrastructure designed to meet your company's IT needs for next-generation cloud applications

Download now

Testing for compliance just became easier

How you can use technology to ensure compliance in your organisation

Download now

Best practices for implementing security awareness training

How to develop a security awareness programme that will actually change behaviour

Download now

Most Popular

data governance

Brexit security talks under threat after UK accused of illegally copying Schengen data

10 Jan 2020
web browser

What is HTTP error 503 and how do you fix it?

7 Jan 2020
Server & storage

Broadberry CyberServe R182-Z90 review: Gigabyte’s EPYC gamble pays off handsomely

7 Jan 2020
Microsoft Windows

Memes and Viking funerals: The internet reacts to the death of Windows 7

14 Jan 2020