Google and privacy: What’s the problem?

Google’s unification of its privacy policies has brought the firm wide criticism. But what’s actually the issue? Simon Brew has been taking a look…

On 1 March 2012, Google enacted its brand new privacy policy. If you're a user of Google's services, and the vast majority of us are, then you might have seen this flagged up as the firm alerted people to changes with prominent messages.

How many people read the information that Google had put together? Precious few, would be our suspicion (around one in 10 is reported to be the figure). Yet some clearly did, as the new changes appear to be losing Google quite a few friends. Furthermore, it's attracting questions over the legality of what it's actually done.

Advertisement - Article continues below

At the very least, it'd be one policy to digest, made as straightforward and simple as it could be.

What could possibly be wrong with that?

From 70 to one?

But what did it do? Well, the firm argues that it has over 70 different services, each of which have individual privacy policies, meaning that what you do on one Google service has no impact on the other. Not unreasonably, it also argues that this is a complicated way of going about things, not least because it makes the privacy situation pretty much impenetrable for its users. It's hard enough wrapping your head around one policy, let alone dozens of them (again, not that too many people actually read them).

Advertisement
Advertisement - Article continues below

So it had a plan: consolidate the privacy policies for the bulk of its services (some, including those for Google Chrome, are excluded) into one. It announced this at the start of the year, arguing that it was doing this in the best interests of its customers.

Advertisement - Article continues below

After all, now if you type a name into a document, and it's someone you'd been e-mailing, it'd be able to automatically correct your spelling. Perhaps it could tie up your geographic location and your calendar, to warn you if you were going to be late for your next appointment? At the very least, it'd be one policy to digest, made as straightforward and simple as it could be.

What could possibly be wrong with that?

Featured Resources

Successful digital transformations are future ready - now

Research findings identify key ingredients to complete your transformation journey

Download now

Cyber security for accountants

3 ways to protect yourself and your clients online

Download now

The future of database administrators in the era of the autonomous database

Autonomous databases are here. So who needs database administrators anymore?

Download now

The IT expert’s guide to AI and content management

Your guide to the biggest opportunities for IT teams when it comes to AI and content management

Download now
Advertisement

Most Popular

Visit/mobile/mobile-phones/355239/microsofts-patent-design-reveals-a-mobile-device-with-a-third-screen
Mobile Phones

Microsoft patents a mobile device with a third screen

6 Apr 2020
Visit/server-storage/servers/355254/a-critical-flaw-in-350000-microsoft-exchange-remains-unpatched
servers

A critical flaw in 350,000 Microsoft Exchange remains unpatched

7 Apr 2020
Visit/software/video-conferencing/355257/taiwan-first-country-to-ban-zoom-amid-security-concerns
video conferencing

Taiwan becomes first country to ban Zoom amid security concerns

8 Apr 2020