Australian spammer fined millions for 280 million emails

An Australian court has fined a spammer A$5.5 million (£2.23 million) for sending over 280 million spam emails.

An Australian court has fined an East Perth-based business seminar promoter Wayne Robert Mansfield, A$5.5 million (2.23 million) for sending unsolicited emails, under Australia's new Spam Act 2003. He is the first to be prosecuted under the new law.

Federal Court Justice Robert Nicholson fined Mr Mansfield, for sending around 280 million spam emails of which at least 231 million commercial emails were sent in the twelve months after the Spam Act 2003 commenced in April 2004, with most of these messages unsolicited and in breach of the Act. His company Clarity1 Pty Ltd has also has been banned from sending any unsolicited emails.

Advertisement - Article continues below

The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) case revolved around millions of messages sent via numerous different offshore IP addresses.

Among its defences, Clarity1 claimed it operated on behalf of charities, that the email addresses it used had been "harvested" prior to the introduction of the Spam Act, that it had business relationships with recipients and that the email recipients had consented to receiving the emails.

Justice Nicholson said in April: "First, the mere fact that Clarity1 sent a CEM (commercial electronic message) to an electronic address and did not receive a response from the recipient does not provide a proper foundation for an inference of consent. From that factual foundation, no such inference is logically open.

Advertisement - Article continues below

"Second, even less so is such inference likely to be open where the entire relationship between Clarity1 and the recipient is constituted in the absence of bilateral communication. There are no circumstances in such a case from which an inference can be drawn."

Advertisement - Article continues below

'Spam causes significant inconvenience to individuals and businesses: disrupts email delivery, clogs up computer systems, reduces productivity, wastes time, irritates users and raises the cost of internet access fees.' said Mr Chris Chapman, ACMA Chairman. 'ACMA's action in this case underscores its vigilant approach to the enforcement of the Spam Act and combating spam.'

Featured Resources

Top 5 challenges of migrating applications to the cloud

Explore how VMware Cloud on AWS helps to address common cloud migration challenges

Download now

3 reasons why now is the time to rethink your network

Changing requirements call for new solutions

Download now

All-flash buyer’s guide

Tips for evaluating Solid-State Arrays

Download now

Enabling enterprise machine and deep learning with intelligent storage

The power of AI can only be realised through efficient and performant delivery of data

Download now



10 quick tips to identifying phishing emails

16 Mar 2020
mergers and acquisitions

Panda Security to be acquired by WatchGuard

9 Mar 2020
internet security

Avast and AVG extensions pulled from Chrome

19 Dec 2019

Google confirms Android cameras can be hijacked to spy on you

20 Nov 2019

Most Popular


Zoom kills Facebook integration after data transfer backlash

30 Mar 2020
Server & storage

HPE warns of 'critical' bug that destroys SSDs after 40,000 hours

26 Mar 2020

These are the companies offering free software during the coronavirus crisis

25 Mar 2020
operating systems

17 Windows 10 problems - and how to fix them

26 Mar 2020