Judge says LinkedIn cannot block third-parties from accessing profile data

The ruling may have implications for social media users wishing to control how their data is collected


A US federal judge has ruled that Microsoft cannot block a startup from accessing data held on its LinkedIn platform, a decision that is likely to have further implications for social media companies wishing to control data that is considered publicly available.

San Francisco judge Edward Chen sided with tech firm hiQ Labs, granting a preliminary injunction that ordered LinkedIn to remove any blocks preventing the startup from accessing profile data, according to Reuters.

Advertisement - Article continues below

"To the extent LinkedIn has already put in place technology to prevent hiQ from accessing these public profiles, it is ordered to remove any such barriers," read the court order.

HiQ Labs required access to the data, which is considered publicly available, to build algorithms designed to predict employee behaviour through their social media activities. The service provides "a crystal ball that helps you determine skills gaps or turnover risks months ahead of time", according to its website, essentially alerting bosses to employees thinking of leaving a firm.

The company has hailed the ruling as a major victory for those relying on public data to deliver services.

"HiQ believes that public data must remain public, and innovation on the internet should not be stifled by legal bullying or the anti-competitive hoarding of public data by a small group of powerful companies," the company said in a statement to Reuters.

Advertisement - Article continues below

LinkedIn has been battling with the startup since May, when it sent a cease and desist order to hiQ Labs in an effort to stop the company lifting profile data from its site. It argued that the use of its data in this way was a breach of its terms of service, and potentially went against the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA).

Advertisement - Article continues below

LinkedIn said it planned to challenge the decision, according to a statement to Reuters.

"We're disappointed in the court's ruling," said LinkedIn spokeswoman Nicole Leverich, to IT Pro. "This case is not over. We will continue to fight to protect our members' ability to control the information they make available on LinkedIn."

The decision leaves social media companies in a tricky spot. Users signing up to the service, particularly job hunting sites like LinkedIn, rely on the ability to have their profile publicly accessible to others, yet they do not necessarily want their data being used by third-party platforms. Currently, the only way to prevent data from being scalped from social media sites is to make your account private.

Featured Resources

Top 5 challenges of migrating applications to the cloud

Explore how VMware Cloud on AWS helps to address common cloud migration challenges

Download now

3 reasons why now is the time to rethink your network

Changing requirements call for new solutions

Download now

All-flash buyer’s guide

Tips for evaluating Solid-State Arrays

Download now

Enabling enterprise machine and deep learning with intelligent storage

The power of AI can only be realised through efficient and performant delivery of data

Download now



UK government may trace COVID-19 patients using mobile phone data

20 Mar 2020
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)

Irish data regulator racks up GDPR cases against Big Tech

24 Feb 2020
data management

EU-US data transfer tools used by Facebook ruled legal

19 Dec 2019

Arcserve UDP 9240DR review: Beef up your backups

4 Apr 2019

Most Popular

Server & storage

HPE warns of 'critical' bug that destroys SSDs after 40,000 hours

26 Mar 2020
video conferencing

Zoom beams iOS user data to Facebook for targeted ads

27 Mar 2020

These are the companies offering free software during the coronavirus crisis

25 Mar 2020
Mobile Phones

Apple lifts iPhone purchase restrictions

23 Mar 2020