Do you really need to invest in new technology?
There's a difficult balance between adding complexity with little benefit and letting systems become outdated
Every organisation needs to plan for its future and put systems in place to help achieve its goals. Better tech will speed up internal processes like accounting and resources management, as well as external relationships with customers, clients, suppliers and partners. For example, what organisation doesn’t want to refresh its website now and again in order to express itself and its offer better?
But does the impetus to innovate and change through technology sometimes drive the organisation? There are often real questions to be answered as to whether all the changes put forward are really necessary and if new technology will actually bring about a great new solution or improved systems. Importantly, is it ever OK just to let tech sit as it is and take a ‘do nothing’ approach?
What is the problem – really?
Technology is not in itself a fix for organisational problems. It can be part of the fix, as a tool in the box, but it is not magic fairy dust. As Bryan Betts, Principal Analyst at Freeform Dynamics, tells IT Pro, it can be used “as a means to an end, not as an end in itself.” Let’s consider online sales: if they are poor, it may not necessarily be because of web site issues. Instead, the problem could be linked to organisational factors, high prices, or even problems with the quality of the product itself.
New technologies should never be introduced without being thoroughly thought through, justified, planned and roadmapped, both organisationally and financially. Betts, has some words of caution: “Introducing new technology for its own sake is rarely going to do more than increase support and training costs. Sometimes we lose sight of the fact that the ‘transformation’ element of digital transformation refers to the organisation and its operations.”
It is also the case that new technologies need to be thoroughly assessed, so that what they can – and can’t – offer is fully understood. Dr. Ying-Ying Hsieh, Assistant Professor of Innovation and Entrepreneurship at Imperial College Business School tells IT Pro: “Taking up innovation at the organisational level requires a critical assessment of the viability and the fit. A manager can only make informed decisions when he or she has deep knowledge of the technology.”
Beware of creating a backlog
While applying new technology for its own sake isn’t advised, organisations that stick with older ways of doing things might be saving up problems for the future. Cutting back on IT spending generally is likely to be a false economy. Consider, for example, the problems that might surface if an old version of a favourite application continues to be used because staff really like it, and/or it’s embedded in other systems so deep that it’s tricky to uncouple.
Newer products will be passed over, even though they could be more streamlined, more user-friendly and offer more useful features. Integration with other products will get harder, and may eventually become impossible. Time-consuming workarounds will get more expensive. Over time, security will become an issue. Eventually, a change will have to be made, and perhaps by the time it comes, the organisation will have spent a small fortune avoiding the inevitable.
For example, consider the move from Windows 7 to Windows 10. For many organisations a gradual change from the older to newer platform, across different departments or teams, in accordance with a costed, budgeted, scheduled roadmap is likely to be more cost efficient than finding it difficult to achieve some tasks or process some workflows as the older system really starts to struggle.
Rolf von Roessing, ISACA (Information Systems Audit and Control Association) board vice chair tells IT Pro: “Spending as little as possible on any IT asset is a significant risk if there are no reserves for the ‘big heave’ investment that is bound to become necessary when legacy technologies are discontinued.”
Keep an eye on the tech game-changers
Organisations don’t exist in a vacuum. It is important to keep an eye on what the competition is up to, and on the technologies that are moving things on in the wider world. Both are aspects of the general ‘horizon scanning’ that will affect how the organisation progresses.
Hsieh uses the example of banks to make the point. They were early to jump into using computers for the provision of services. “Their legacy systems were created in the 60s and 70s, but the banks are still using them to handle customers’ accounts because they are too big and too complex to change,” she says.
Such banks are being challenged by newer, startup banks with customer friendly apps and back end systems that those using legacy technology struggle to match. These challenger banks can be faster to react to changing user demands and to launch new services, and more adept at meeting regulatory requirements. They can be more profitable too.
This type of experience isn’t just applicable to banks. Hsieh explains: “Large firms or industry leaders can be trapped by the competency they built. In management theory, we call it the ‘competency trap’, which prevents the company from learning and innovating.”
In the end, then, it seems it’s never a good thing just to hold your ground and work with the technologies you have till they fall over. But it is also important to see technology for what it is – a means to an end, a tool to help the organisation do better, and not a fix for problems in its own right.
Digital document processes in 2020: A spotlight on Western Europe
The shift from best practice to business necessityDownload now
Four security considerations for cloud migration
The good, the bad, and the ugly of cloud computingDownload now
VR leads the way in manufacturing
How VR is digitally transforming our worldDownload now
Deeper than digital
Top-performing modern enterprises show why more perfect software is fundamental to successDownload now