Google and Microsoft's hybrid work battle shows the narrative is just as important as the technology
Two of the biggest workspace collaboration players have finally decided what ‘the new normal’ means to them and their customers
When the pandemic threw the world into limbo, nobody saw Zoom coming. The video conferencing platform previously enjoyed a relatively small customer base and modest brand recognition, yet it surged past household names such as Skype, Facetime and WhatsApp.
As remote working expanded, Zoom unexpectedly captured the COVID-19 zeitgeist in a way that likely not even Zoom was prepared for, with its workplace collaboration rivals, including Microsoft and Google, desperately playing catchup.
In the subsequent months, the focus has shifted from supporting remote working needs on platforms like Microsoft Teams or Google Workplace to catering for whatever comes next. ‘The new normal’ has long been a concept without meaning, although both Microsoft and Google have now thrown the gauntlet to the broader industry in their efforts to define this in the context of hybrid working. As such, they're overhauling their core platforms to meet the anticipated demands of businesses now and in the future.
Defining ‘the new normal’ with technology
Both Microsoft and Google have announced major overhauls to their respective workplace collaboration platforms, Microsoft Teams and Google Workspace, this week, marketing a similar set of features towards the same cohort of customers. Although each platform has enjoyed massive wins during the pandemic - on-boarding new customers as well as catering to the existing user base - they're now set on a collision course. Both are attempting to define hybrid work on their own terms to capture a definitive market share.
Microsoft Teams will integrate technology to improve hybrid meetings, namely adding AI cameras to physical Teams Rooms spaces. These devices include active speaker tracking technology, so speakers are detected automatically, multiple video streams, so all participants are assigned their own video panes, and people recognition, so users are labelled for the benefit of others.
Google, meanwhile, has added Meet calling to its video conferencing capabilities to encourage more spontaneity between remote workers. You can, for example, open up a one-to-one chat within Gmail without needing to schedule it first. It aims to strip away the uncomfortable formality of video conferencing that’s existed since the start of the pandemic. This comes alongside Spaces, which mimics Slack channels, allowing users to collaborate and converse in defined ‘spaces’ alongside tight integrations with tools such as Drive, Calendar and Tasks.
Many of the new features actually pave the way for harmonisation between the two platforms; each borrowing ideas that have long existed in the other product. Google Spaces is a prime example, as is Outlook RSVP, which allows Teams users to check into meetings to say whether they’re attending in-person or online.
Regardless of which tools are borrowed, and which are innovative, much of this isn’t about what’s new but rather the messaging around these changes. The timing of these announcements, for example, and the buildup around them, speaks to how seriously these companies are taking what they see as a massive turning point in the future of workplace collaboration.
Capturing the zeitgeist
Microsoft had trailed its news for a couple of weeks prior, allowing reporters to preview the research fuelling the Teams overhaul, and learn how these tweaks address the fundamental hybrid work challenge. A little more than 24 hours before Microsoft’s embargo lifted, Google lifted the lid on its own announcement without warning, attempting to gazump Microsoft with its plans to ‘bridge the hybrid work gaps’ with updates to Google Workspace.
This is a critical moment in the evolution of workspace collaboration technology, and the timing of Google’s announcement speaks volumes. Its eagerness to upstage its rival, on the day before a much-anticipated retooling of Microsoft Teams, reveals how seriously these firms are trying to capture the zeitgeist in the way that Zoom managed to early in the pandemic. Facebook’s own VR-powered hybrid work platform launched last month, Horizon Workrooms, also speaks to this trend.
In its research, Microsoft established that employee expectations are constantly changing and that inconsistencies are emerging that may challenge businesses as they hope to reconfigure their workplaces. For example, employees who mostly prefer to work remotely, and those who prefer to work mostly in the office, are doing so for the same reason - it allows them to focus. Employees are also planning to go into the office more often than managers expect them to, while managers are more likely to want to work in the office than they are to work remotely.
These companies are clear in their ambitions to capture as large a market share as possible as the dust settles on the nature of hybrid work. This urgency is exemplified by this week’s collision between Google and Microsoft, although you can also feasibly throw Facebook and even Salesforce into the mix, following its $28 billion Slack acquisition. Given the fact that all these platforms by and large mirror each other in terms of the core capabilities and features, it’s perhaps more about the messaging than it is about the technology.
Microsoft and Google, certainly, are hoping to demonstrate a powerful ability to tap into an overarching narrative that might appeal to businesses seeking guidance as they navigate the uncertainty of the future of work.
The definitive guide to warehouse efficiency
Get your free guide to creating efficiencies in the warehouseFree download
The total economic impact™ of Datto
Cost savings and business benefits of using Datto Integrated SolutionsDownload now
Three-step guide to modern customer experience
Support the critical role CX plays in your businessFree download
The global state of the channelDownload now