Sen. Wyden withdraws support for web privacy amendment

Wyden withdraws support in response to Chairman Schiff’s comments on the amendment

Democrat Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon has withdrawn support for a House amendment that would have stopped the FBI’s ability to collect American’s internet search and browsing records without a warrant. The senator’s decision is in response to a statement provided to the New York Times by House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff.

Advertisement - Article continues below

The amendment from Representatives Zoe Lofgren and Warren Davidson sought to block law enforcement officials from gathering web-browsing history without first securing a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant. 

In a statement to reporters, Schiff suggested that FISA warrant or not, the measure would still allow officials to collect Americans' records, so long as the records were deemed relevant to a foreign intelligence investigation.

In a response to Schiff’s statement, Wyden, who first proposed the amendment with Republican Senator Steve Daines, withdrew his support. Wyden explained that he no longer believed the amendment would protect Americans from unwarranted FBI surveillance.

“The House Intelligence Committee chairman’s assertion that the Lofgren-Davidson amendment does not fully protect Americans from warrantless collection flatly contradicts the intent of Wyden-Daines, and my understanding of the amendment agreed to earlier today," Wyden said in a statement.

"It is now clear that there is no agreement with the House Intelligence Committee to enact true protections for Americans’ rights against dragnet collection of online activity, which is why I must oppose this amendment, along with the underlying bill, and urge the House to vote on the original Wyden-Daines amendment," Wyden concluded.

Advertisement
Advertisement - Article continues below
Advertisement - Article continues below

Per The Hill, Davidson chastised Schiff in his own statement, suggesting that Schiff and his fellow "intelligence hawks" are attempting to thwart the amendment so they "protect the surveillance state status quo."

"Hopefully everyone will wake up and defend the Constitution," Davidson told The Hill. "It’s time for the House to protect one of Americans’ most basic freedoms—the right to privacy.”

Featured Resources

Preparing for long-term remote working after COVID-19

Learn how to safely and securely enable your remote workforce

Download now

Cloud vs on-premise storage: What’s right for you?

Key considerations driving document storage decisions for businesses

Download now

Staying ahead of the game in the world of data

Create successful marketing campaigns by understanding your customers better

Download now

Transforming productivity

Solutions that facilitate work at full speed

Download now
Advertisement

Most Popular

Visit/mobile/google-android/356373/over-2-dozen-additional-android-apps-found-stealing-user-data
Google Android

Over two dozen Android apps found stealing user data

7 Jul 2020
Visit/laptops/29190/how-to-find-ram-speed-size-and-type
Laptops

How to find RAM speed, size and type

24 Jun 2020
Visit/cloud/356260/the-road-to-recovery
Sponsored

The road to recovery

30 Jun 2020