Apple hit with $1.4 billion Siri patent infringement lawsuit

Shanghai Zhizhen claims Apple violated its virtual assistant patent and requests Apple halts sales

Apple is in hot water after Shanghai Zhizhen Network Technology Co. announced today it’s suing the tech giant in a Shanghai court for an estimated 10 billion yuan ($1.43 billion) in damages.

The company alleges Apple’s products, namely those equipped with Siri, violated its virtual assistant patent, which has a technical structure similar to Siri’s. As part of the suit, Shanghai Zhizhen has requested Apple halt the sales, production and use of products in violation of the patent.

In June, China’s Supreme Court ruled Shanghai Zhizhen owns the patent for the virtual assistant in China. Fang Jianwei, a former Chinese judge, told The Wall Street Journal that should Shanghai Zhizhen apply for a preliminary injunction, the court could ban Apple from selling products equipped with Siri in China during the trial. However, Fang explained, Chinese courts rarely grant such orders.

For Apple, China is its most important foreign sales market, as it’s second only to the US Sales in China accounted for roughly 16% of Apple's Q3 revenue, which added up to $9.33 billion. 

The patent infringement suit isn’t a first for Apple. The company has faced multiple lawsuits concerning intellectual property in China. In 2012, it agreed to pay $60 million to settle a trademark dispute with Proview International Holdings Ltd., which claimed ownership of the “iPad” name in China.

Four years later, Apple lost another trademark battle after a Beijing court ruled in favor of Xintong Tiandi Technology Co., a Chinese maker of leather goods using the label “IPHONE.”

Apple is facing a patent lawsuit in the US, too, with headphone manufacturer Koss is accusing Apple of infringing on five wireless headphone patents. The claim was made against AirPods and Beats wireless headphones and, according to Koss, the infringement has caused the company irreparable harm. 

To remedy the situation, Koss asks courts to award it an unspecified amount in damages “that compensates it for such infringement, which by law cannot be less than a reasonable royalty, together with interest and costs.”

Featured Resources

How to be an MSP: Seven steps to success

Building your business from the ground up

Download now

The smart buyer’s guide to flash

Find out whether flash storage is right for your business

Download now

How MSPs build outperforming sales teams

The definitive guide to sales

Download now

The business guide to ransomware

Everything you need to know to keep your company afloat

Download now

Recommended

Apple doubles down in the US with $430 billion investment
business intelligence (BI)

Apple doubles down in the US with $430 billion investment

27 Apr 2021
iPhone 12 mini review: Mini phone, major fun
Mobile Phones

iPhone 12 mini review: Mini phone, major fun

14 May 2021
Most iPhone users plan to buy Apple AirTags
Hardware

Most iPhone users plan to buy Apple AirTags

13 May 2021
Tech giants lobby US to fund chip production
Hardware

Tech giants lobby US to fund chip production

11 May 2021

Most Popular

KPMG offers staff 'four-day fortnight' in hybrid work plans
flexible working

KPMG offers staff 'four-day fortnight' in hybrid work plans

6 May 2021
16 ways to speed up your laptop
Laptops

16 ways to speed up your laptop

29 Apr 2021
How to move Windows 10 from your old hard drive to SSD
operating systems

How to move Windows 10 from your old hard drive to SSD

30 Apr 2021