Apple hit with $1.4 billion Siri patent infringement lawsuit

Shanghai Zhizhen claims Apple violated its virtual assistant patent and requests Apple halts sales

Apple is in hot water after Shanghai Zhizhen Network Technology Co. announced today it’s suing the tech giant in a Shanghai court for an estimated 10 billion yuan ($1.43 billion) in damages.

The company alleges Apple’s products, namely those equipped with Siri, violated its virtual assistant patent, which has a technical structure similar to Siri’s. As part of the suit, Shanghai Zhizhen has requested Apple halt the sales, production and use of products in violation of the patent.

In June, China’s Supreme Court ruled Shanghai Zhizhen owns the patent for the virtual assistant in China. Fang Jianwei, a former Chinese judge, told The Wall Street Journal that should Shanghai Zhizhen apply for a preliminary injunction, the court could ban Apple from selling products equipped with Siri in China during the trial. However, Fang explained, Chinese courts rarely grant such orders.

For Apple, China is its most important foreign sales market, as it’s second only to the US Sales in China accounted for roughly 16% of Apple's Q3 revenue, which added up to $9.33 billion. 

The patent infringement suit isn’t a first for Apple. The company has faced multiple lawsuits concerning intellectual property in China. In 2012, it agreed to pay $60 million to settle a trademark dispute with Proview International Holdings Ltd., which claimed ownership of the “iPad” name in China.

Four years later, Apple lost another trademark battle after a Beijing court ruled in favor of Xintong Tiandi Technology Co., a Chinese maker of leather goods using the label “IPHONE.”

Apple is facing a patent lawsuit in the US, too, with headphone manufacturer Koss is accusing Apple of infringing on five wireless headphone patents. The claim was made against AirPods and Beats wireless headphones and, according to Koss, the infringement has caused the company irreparable harm. 

To remedy the situation, Koss asks courts to award it an unspecified amount in damages “that compensates it for such infringement, which by law cannot be less than a reasonable royalty, together with interest and costs.”

Featured Resources

The ultimate law enforcement agency guide to going mobile

Best practices for implementing a mobile device program

Free download

The business value of Red Hat OpenShift

Platform cost savings, ROI, and the challenges and opportunities of Red Hat OpenShift

Free download

Managing security and risk across the IT supply chain: A practical approach

Best practices for IT supply chain security

Free download

Digital remote monitoring and dispatch services’ impact on edge computing and data centres

Seven trends redefining remote monitoring and field service dispatch service requirements

Free download

Recommended

IT Pro News in Review: MacBook refresh, Facebook creating jobs and facial recognition in schools
Hardware

IT Pro News in Review: MacBook refresh, Facebook creating jobs and facial recognition in schools

22 Oct 2021
Apple unveils redesigned MacBook Pro with M1 Pro, M1 Max chips
Laptops

Apple unveils redesigned MacBook Pro with M1 Pro, M1 Max chips

18 Oct 2021
Apple reportedly slashes iPhone 13 production due to chip crisis
components

Apple reportedly slashes iPhone 13 production due to chip crisis

13 Oct 2021
Apple expected to unveil MacBook Pro revamp at 18 October event
Laptops

Apple expected to unveil MacBook Pro revamp at 18 October event

13 Oct 2021

Most Popular

Best Linux distros 2021
operating systems

Best Linux distros 2021

11 Oct 2021
Apple MacBook Pro 15in vs Dell XPS 15: Clash of the titans
Laptops

Apple MacBook Pro 15in vs Dell XPS 15: Clash of the titans

11 Oct 2021
Windows 11 has problems with Oracle VirtualBox
Microsoft Windows

Windows 11 has problems with Oracle VirtualBox

5 Oct 2021