Apple hit with $1.4 billion Siri patent infringement lawsuit

Shanghai Zhizhen claims Apple violated its virtual assistant patent and requests Apple halts sales

Apple is in hot water after Shanghai Zhizhen Network Technology Co. announced today it’s suing the tech giant in a Shanghai court for an estimated 10 billion yuan ($1.43 billion) in damages.

The company alleges Apple’s products, namely those equipped with Siri, violated its virtual assistant patent, which has a technical structure similar to Siri’s. As part of the suit, Shanghai Zhizhen has requested Apple halt the sales, production and use of products in violation of the patent.

In June, China’s Supreme Court ruled Shanghai Zhizhen owns the patent for the virtual assistant in China. Fang Jianwei, a former Chinese judge, told The Wall Street Journal that should Shanghai Zhizhen apply for a preliminary injunction, the court could ban Apple from selling products equipped with Siri in China during the trial. However, Fang explained, Chinese courts rarely grant such orders.

For Apple, China is its most important foreign sales market, as it’s second only to the US Sales in China accounted for roughly 16% of Apple's Q3 revenue, which added up to $9.33 billion. 

The patent infringement suit isn’t a first for Apple. The company has faced multiple lawsuits concerning intellectual property in China. In 2012, it agreed to pay $60 million to settle a trademark dispute with Proview International Holdings Ltd., which claimed ownership of the “iPad” name in China.

Four years later, Apple lost another trademark battle after a Beijing court ruled in favor of Xintong Tiandi Technology Co., a Chinese maker of leather goods using the label “IPHONE.”

Apple is facing a patent lawsuit in the US, too, with headphone manufacturer Koss is accusing Apple of infringing on five wireless headphone patents. The claim was made against AirPods and Beats wireless headphones and, according to Koss, the infringement has caused the company irreparable harm. 

To remedy the situation, Koss asks courts to award it an unspecified amount in damages “that compensates it for such infringement, which by law cannot be less than a reasonable royalty, together with interest and costs.”

Featured Resources

B2B under quarantine

Key B2C e-commerce features B2B need to adopt to survive

Download now

The top three IT pains of the new reality and how to solve them

Driving more resiliency with unified operations and service management

Download now

The five essentials from your endpoint security partner

Empower your MSP business to operate efficiently

Download now

How fashion retailers are redesigning their digital future

Fashion retail guide

Download now

Recommended

Apple reportedly planning all-5G iPhone lineup for 2022
Hardware

Apple reportedly planning all-5G iPhone lineup for 2022

21 Jul 2021
Apple reportedly delays return to the office amid rising COVID cases
Careers & training

Apple reportedly delays return to the office amid rising COVID cases

20 Jul 2021
Apple's M2 chip to debut in early 2022, leaker claims
Hardware

Apple's M2 chip to debut in early 2022, leaker claims

6 Jul 2021
Apple plans return to office despite employee complaints
flexible working

Apple plans return to office despite employee complaints

30 Jun 2021

Most Popular

The benefits of workload optimisation
Sponsored

The benefits of workload optimisation

16 Jul 2021
RMIT to be first Australian university to implement AWS supercomputing facility
high-performance computing (HPC)

RMIT to be first Australian university to implement AWS supercomputing facility

28 Jul 2021
Samsung Galaxy S21 5G review: A rose-tinted experience
Mobile Phones

Samsung Galaxy S21 5G review: A rose-tinted experience

14 Jul 2021