Epic files complaint against Apple with UK's competition watchdog
The firm argues that Apple's App Store rules are "a clear violation of the UK Competition Act of 1998"
Epic Games has officially filed a complaint with the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) to support the watchdog’s investigation into Apple’s anti-competitive behaviour.
Epic’s complaint alleges that Apple’s anti-competitive behaviour and rules governing the distribution of apps and payment processing constitute “a clear violation of the UK Competition Act of 1998.”
Epic claims this illustrates Apple’s monopolistic practices “which forbid users and developers respectively from acquiring or distributing apps through marketplaces other than Apple’s App Store, while simultaneously forcing any in-app purchase to be processed through Apple’s own payment system.”
“By kneecapping the competition and exerting its monopoly power over app distribution and payments, Apple strips UK consumers of the right to choose how and where they get their apps, while locking developers into a single marketplace that lets Apple charge any commission rate they choose,” said Epic Games founder and CEO Tim Sweeney.
“These harmful practices lead to artificially inflated costs for consumers, and stifle innovation among developers, many of whom are unable to compete in a digital ecosystem that is rigged against them.”
An Apple spokesperson told IT Pro: "It is not surprising that Epic is pushing their agenda before the UK Competition and Markets Authority, as we have seen them use the same playbook around the world.
“Now that they have achieved massive success through the App Store, becoming a multi-billion pound corporation, Epic wants to operate under a different set of rules than the ones that apply to all other developers. The result would be weakened privacy and data security protections for our customers, and we think that’s wrong."
The games company has also commenced legal proceedings against Apple in other jurisdictions including the US and Australia. It has filed an antitrust complaint in the EU too in support of its ongoing investigation into the tech giant’s App Store conduct.
Epic claims it isn’t seeking monetary damages but is instead pursuing “regulatory remedies that will prevent Apple’s intentional distortion and manipulation of the market and ensure fair access and competition for consumers and developers in the UK and around the world.”
In February, the UK Competition Appeal Tribunal dismissed Epic Games’ lawsuit against Apple but determined that it could pursue its case against Google in the UK.
Epic announced it was suing Apple and Google in December as the two tech companies had removed Fortnite from their app stores. The game had been removed as Epic said it would offer a 20% discount to players who purchase in-game currency directly from Fortnite instead of through Apple and Google’s apps, which take a 30% cut of all payments made in games and downloads through their stores.
The ultimate law enforcement agency guide to going mobile
Best practices for implementing a mobile device programFree download
The business value of Red Hat OpenShift
Platform cost savings, ROI, and the challenges and opportunities of Red Hat OpenShiftFree download
Managing security and risk across the IT supply chain: A practical approach
Best practices for IT supply chain securityFree download
Digital remote monitoring and dispatch services’ impact on edge computing and data centres
Seven trends redefining remote monitoring and field service dispatch service requirementsFree download