Social media firms face fines and shutdowns under draft UK law

The Online Safety Bill introduces GDPR-style fines and threatens criminal charges against social media executives

The UK government has proposed new regulations that could see social media companies fined up to 10% of their annual turnover, or £18 million, for failing to quash online abuse, with criminal charges levied against senior management. 

The landmark Online Safety Bill, which aims to clamp down on the spread of unadulterated hate speech on platforms such as Facebook and Twitter, will grant Ofcom the powers to enforce a statutory duty of care. This was devised in response to the Online Harms White Paper consultation and has been in development for a couple of years.

The legislation will also contain provisions to encourage free expression and democratic debate online, which Ofcom will also be tasked with defining and enforcing. 

“Category 1” companies, which include the largest and most popular sites, have additional duties to block content that is lawful, but still harmful, while also publishing up-to-date assessments on how they protect freedom of speech.

“Today the UK shows global leadership with our groundbreaking laws to usher in a new age of accountability for tech and bring fairness and accountability to the online world,” said digital secretary Oliver Dowden. 

Related Resource

Don’t just educate: Create cyber-safe behaviour

Designing effective security awareness and training programmes

How to define effective security awareness and training programmesDownload now

“We will protect children on the internet, crackdown on racist abuse on social media and through new measures to safeguard our liberties, create a truly democratic digital age.”

The most alarming aspect of the rules, as far as social media firms are concerned, is the scope within the law to block access to the sites for violations, as well as the prospect of introducing a new criminal offence for senior managers.  

These criminal charges, however, will only be introduced into law if, after a two-year review period, tech companies “fail to live up to their new responsibilities”. They would be levied against managers whose companies don’t comply with Ofcom’s requests for information.

The government has, for many years, been working on introducing a form of statutory mechanism for enforcing rules on social media sites. 

This has run parallel to devising plans to more strictly enforce competition law. Beyond handing Ofcom more powers, the government last month established the Digital Markets Unit (DMU) to regulate the anti-competitive activities of large tech companies. 

Featured Resources

Defeating ransomware with unified security from WatchGuard

How SMBs can defend against the onslaught of ransomware attacks

Free download

The IT expert’s guide to AI and content management

How artificial intelligence and machine learning could be critical to your business

Free download

The path to CX excellence

Four stages to thrive in the experience economy

Free download

Becoming an experience-based business

Your blueprint for a strong digital foundation

Free download

Recommended

Senator wants social media companies held liable for spreading anti-vax lies
social media

Senator wants social media companies held liable for spreading anti-vax lies

23 Jul 2021

Most Popular

What are the pros and cons of AI?
machine learning

What are the pros and cons of AI?

8 Sep 2021
Apple patches zero-day flaw abused by infamous NSO exploit
exploits

Apple patches zero-day flaw abused by infamous NSO exploit

14 Sep 2021
Google takes down map showing homes of 111,000 Guntrader customers
data breaches

Google takes down map showing homes of 111,000 Guntrader customers

2 Sep 2021