Attorneys general from 37 states sue Google over 'unlawful Play Store monopoly'
Lawsuit claims that the tech giant allegedly paid off Samsung and app developers too
The lawsuit also claims that the tech giant paid off Samsung and other app developers in order to limit market competition.
The allegations against Google’s Play Store come from an investigation involving 50 states in September 2019 and has resulted in three lawsuits against the company.
Now, the states, which are led by Utah, New York, North Carolina, and Tennessee, said in a lawsuit filed at the Northern District of California that “Google leverages its monopoly power with Android to unlawfully maintain its monopoly in the Android app distribution market”.
The lawsuit alleges that a one-off payment was offered to Samsung in exchange for the limiting of development on its own competing app store.
“Google initially proposed paying Samsung up to [Redacted] ; in return, Samsung would give up its direct commercial relationships in app distribution with consumers and developers,” states the lawsuit.
The lawsuit also alleges that Google bought off key app developers to stifle competition in the Android app distribution market by deterring them from making their apps available outside the Play Store.
“To do so, Google shared its monopoly profits by providing these app developers in-kind services and adding distribution restrictions through an addendum to the DDA” it said in the lawsuit.
“Google’s monopoly is a menace to the marketplace. Google Play is not fair play. Google must be held accountable for harming small businesses and consumers,” said Utah attorney general Sean Reyes. “It must stop using its monopolistic power and hyper-dominant market position to unlawfully leverage billions of added dollars from smaller companies, competitors and consumers beyond what should be paid.”
Wilson White, senior director of public policy at Google, said in a statement that it was “strange” a group of state attorneys general chose to file a lawsuit attacking a system that “provides more openness and choice than others”.
“This complaint mimics a similarly meritless lawsuit filed by the large app developer Epic Games, which has benefitted from Android’s openness by distributing its Fortnite app outside of Google Play,” he said.
“This lawsuit isn’t about helping the little guy or protecting consumers. It’s about boosting a handful of major app developers who want the benefits of Google Play without paying for it,” added White.
IT Pro has asked Samsung to comment on the lawsuit.
Spotlight: The state of the UK & Ireland mid-sized business and IT today 2021
The UK and Ireland’s mid market firms faced a difficult 2020 but have a strong platform for recoveryDownload now
Last year, the Department of Justice (DoJ) charged Google with violating federal antitrust law. The investigation determined that the tech giant improperly used its digital dominance to affect corporate rivals and consumers negatively, and alleges that the company maintained a monopoly in search and search advertising.
Meanwhile, US antitrust bills that are designed to curb big tech passed the House Committee stage last month. This included the American Innovation and Choice Online Act which looks to prohibit discriminatory conduct by dominant platforms, while also banning self-preferencing, prohibiting big tech companies from favouring their own products on their platforms.
The ultimate law enforcement agency guide to going mobile
Best practices for implementing a mobile device programFree download
The business value of Red Hat OpenShift
Platform cost savings, ROI, and the challenges and opportunities of Red Hat OpenShiftFree download
Managing security and risk across the IT supply chain: A practical approach
Best practices for IT supply chain securityFree download
Digital remote monitoring and dispatch services’ impact on edge computing and data centres
Seven trends redefining remote monitoring and field service dispatch service requirementsFree download