Uber CISO: There was no justification for hiding data breach

Senators slam taxi firm for cover-up of hack affecting 57 million people

Uber's CISO yesterday admitted that there was "no justification" for covering up a huge data breach affecting millions of customers and drivers.

The breach, which was first reported in November last year, exposed the personal information of 57 million users, including 2.7 million in the UK, as well as the license numbers of roughly 600,000 drivers.

Uber's John Flynn told US lawmakers at a Senate hearing yesterday that the company made an error in not disclosing the intrusion to the authorities and to its customers, saying: "We made a misstep in not reporting to consumers, and I think we made a misstep in not reporting to law enforcement."

Advertisement - Article continues below

Rather than report the breach, Uber paid one of the two hackers responsible $100,000 to keep the breach under wraps and to not leak the stolen data.

Senators also noted that while Uber was covering this breach up, it was in the midst of negotiations with the Federal Trade Commission over a settlement for an earlier data breach.

The money was delivered through a bug bounty programme - a framework usually used to reward ethical hackers for reporting flaws to companies rather than exploiting them. Flynn acknowledged in his testimony that this use of the bug bounty programme was 'inappropriate'.

Advertisement - Article continues below

"We recognise that the bug bounty programme is not an appropriate vehicle for dealing with intruders who seek to extort funds from the company," he said. "The approach that these intruders took was separate and distinct from those of the researchers in the security community for whom bug bounty programs are designed."

Advertisement - Article continues below

Legislators slammed Uber over its conduct, calling its actions "morally wrong and legally reprehensible".

"There ought to be no question here that Uber's payment of this blackmail without notifying consumers who were greatly at risk was morally wrong and legally reprehensible and violated not only the law but the norm of what should be expected," said Democratic senator Richard Blumenthal.

"The fact that the company took approximately a year to notify impacted users raises red flags within this committee as to what systemic issues prevented such time-sensitive information from being made available to those left vulnerable," added Republican and Senate panel chairman senator Jerry Moran.

Featured Resources

The case for a marketing content hub

Transform your digital marketing to deliver customer expectations

Download now

Fast, flexible and compliant e-signatures for global businesses

Be at the forefront of digital transformation with electronic signatures

Download now

Why CEOS should care about the move to SAP S/4HANA

And how they can accelerate business value

Download now

IT faces new security challenges in the wake of COVID-19

Beat the crisis by learning how to secure your network

Download now



INKY announces $20M Series B funding round

4 Jun 2020

Microsoft issues warning about new PonyFinal ransomware attacks

3 Jun 2020
data breaches

Amtrak Guest Reward suffers a data breach

3 Jun 2020
cyber security

Brand-impersonation and form-based attacks are rising

3 Jun 2020

Most Popular


Apple confirms serious bugs in iOS 13.5

4 Jun 2020

The UK looks to Japan and South Korea for 5G equipment

4 Jun 2020

Tycoon ransomware discovered using Java image files to target software firms

5 Jun 2020