“Significant” data collection failings are harming children's mental health services

MPs criticise huge gaps in data gathering, with public bodies lacking the information needed to monitor progress

Binary code graphic to represent vast amounts of data

Serious failings in data collection have undermined the government's efforts to bring mental health provision in line with physical healthcare, a committee of MPs has warned.

The lack of a coherent government-led data gathering strategy has led to "significant gaps" in the information available to effectively deliver mental health services for young people, according to the House of Commons' Public Accounts Committee (PAC).

Advertisement - Article continues below

These major weaknesses have meant it's been hard to monitor progress against lofty ambitions set in the 2014 'Foward View', while also affecting where funding is allocated and how much staffing is available. This is disproportionately affecting the provision of mental health care for children and young people, the committee said.

"At the start of the Forward View, the NHS lacked the necessary baseline information to measure progress against its plans, for example, on the number of children and young people receiving NHS treatment," the report found.

"The NHS intended that the new Mental Health Services Data Set would provide much of this information but this is behind schedule: for example, reliable data on patient outcomes are not expected until 2019."

The five-year Forward View set the NHS a target for an additional 70,000 children to be treated per year by 2021, as well as an increase to the proportion of young people with a mental health condition who receive treatment from 25% to 35%.

But the NHS has not been able to measure its progress against these targets as there was no robust national data collection scheme in place between 2014 and 2017.

Advertisement
Advertisement - Article continues below
Advertisement - Article continues below

NHS England commissioned a one-off data gathering programme for 2017/18, but due to a lack of information for previous years, there was no way of understanding growth rates in patient access to mental health services. This one-off programme was renewed for 2018/19.

The lack of available financial data may have also rendered the 1.4 billion the government allocated to transform young people's mental health provision in 2014 and 2015 ineffective. The PAC concluded that NHS England couldn't be sure that clinical commissioning groups (CCGs), who allocate funding for health provision, spent the additional money as intended.

Meanwhile, the non-departmental public sector organisation Health Education England, which was set up to bolster skills and leadership within the NHS workforce, still has no data for staffing within young people's mental health, despite ambitions to increase levels.

The body in effect lacks the information and tools to execute its own plan to develop the mental health workforce as it's unable to monitor progress.

Advertisement - Article continues below

The PAC said the little data that is available points to a modest 1% increase in the overall mental health workforce between April 2015 and September 2017, while policy issues such as the removal of the nurses' bursary have led to difficulties retaining staff.

NHS England told the PAC that a set of early intervention and prevention services across schools will be tested across roughly 20-25% of England, with the data this generates feeding into a nationwide-rollout.

The PAC has recommended that alongside the newly-published 10-year plan, the health service must establish what 'parity of esteem' means in practice, and how it will gather the data necessary to monitor progress and improve healthcare outcomes.

A robust baseline, more than anything, needs to be established by April 2019, the committee said, and the NHS should set out what arrangements are in place to collect the data it needs to fulfil this ambition and inform the roll-out of future services.

Advertisement - Article continues below

IT Pro approached NHS Digital, NHS England and the Department for Health and Social Care (DHSC) for comment.

NHS Digital was unable to comment on the grounds that it's bound by the Code of Practice for Statistics. NHS England and DHSC, who make decisions around data research, did not respond at the time of writing.

Featured Resources

Preparing for long-term remote working after COVID-19

Learn how to safely and securely enable your remote workforce

Download now

Cloud vs on-premise storage: What’s right for you?

Key considerations driving document storage decisions for businesses

Download now

Staying ahead of the game in the world of data

Create successful marketing campaigns by understanding your customers better

Download now

Transforming productivity

Solutions that facilitate work at full speed

Download now
Advertisement
Advertisement

Most Popular

Visit/laptops/29190/how-to-find-ram-speed-size-and-type
Laptops

How to find RAM speed, size and type

24 Jun 2020
Visit/business/business-operations/356395/nvidia-overtakes-intel-as-most-valuable-us-chipmaker
Business operations

Nvidia overtakes Intel as most valuable US chipmaker

9 Jul 2020
Visit/mobile/google-android/356373/over-2-dozen-additional-android-apps-found-stealing-user-data
Google Android

Over two dozen Android apps found stealing user data

7 Jul 2020