Basildon Council lands £150,000 fine by ICO after revealing family’s personal details
Authority exposed personal data including mental health issues
The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) has fined Basildon Council 150,000 for publishing online the personal data of a traveller family.
The authority breached the Data Protection Act by making publically available data on the family in a planning application.
The ICO discovered that the council received a written statement in support of a householder's planning application for proposed works in a green belt. The statement contained sensitive personal data relating to a static traveller family who had been living on the site for many years.
It referred to the family's disability requirements, including mental health issues, the names of all the family members, their ages and the location of their home. The council published the statement in full, without redacting the personal data, on its online planning portal later that day.
An investigation by the ICO found that the council failed to carry out data protection procedures and training. It was revealed that an inexperienced council officer didn't notice the personal information in the statement, and there was no procedure in place for a second person to check it before the personal data was inadvertently published online. The information was only removed on 4 September 2015 when the concerns came to light.
While the council had routinely redacted personal data from planning documents a practice also adopted by other local authorities Basildon subsequently argued it was not, in fact, allowed to do so under planning law. This was rejected by the ICO, which said planning regulations could not override people's fundamental privacy and data protection rights. It added that publication of planning documents online was a choice, not a legal requirement.
"This was a serious incident in which highly sensitive personal data, including medical information, was made publicly available," said ICO enforcement manager Sally Anne Poole.
"Planning applications in themselves can be controversial and emotive, so to include such sensitive information and leave it out there for all to see for several weeks is simply unacceptable."
"Data protection law is clear and planning regulations don't remove an individual's rights. Local authorities and, indeed, all organisations must be certain that their internal processes and procedures are robust and secure enough to ensure that people's sensitive personal information is protected," she added.
Security analytics for your multi-cloud deployments
IBM Security QRadar SIEM solution briefDownload now
Five reasons to move to the cloud
Join the enterprises moving their workloads to the cloudDownload now
Architecting hybrid IT and edge for digital advantage
Why business leaders should consider a hybrid IT strategyDownload now
Six reasons to accelerate remote asset monitoring with AI
How to optimise resources, increase productivity, and grow profit margins with AIDownload now