US backs down over unmasking anti-Trump Twitter account

Claim dropped after Twitter files a lawsuit against the government

The US government has given up on its quest to force Twitter to reveal details of an anti-Trump account, @ALT_USCIS, just a day after the social network announced it would be taking authorities to court to block attempts to find out who's behind the tweets.

Twitter decided to take legal action against the US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agency, part of the Department of Homeland Security, because it felt summoning the information was "abusing a limited-purpose investigatory tool" and completely going against freedom of speech.

Advertisement - Article continues below

The social network was supported by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which said it would stand by Twitter and take action against the government too if it continued its attempt to find out the account's genuine owner.

@ALT_USCIS also had a huge amount of support from the Twitter community, with its user base increasing from 38,000 to 158,000 in a day

The government wanted Twitter to hand over all details of the account including "user names, account login, phone numbers, mailing addresses, and IP (computer) addresses."

07/04/2017: Twitter pushes back against US government data demand

Twitter is suing the American government to stop authorities from revealing the person behind an account that's criticised President Trump.

Advertisement
Advertisement - Article continues below

Trump's administration is targeting the @ALT_USCIS account because it claims to be run by government staff at the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service. The Department of Homeland Security is using a "limited-purpose investigatory tool" to find out who is behind the account, which Twitter argues it should not be allowed to do.

Advertisement - Article continues below

"The rights of free speech afforded Twitter's users and Twitter itself under the First Amendment of the US Constitution include a right to disseminate such anonymous or pseudonymous political speech," the social media site argues in the legal filing.

The filing added that Twitter need not hand over such data unless a criminal or civil offence has been committed, noting that the specific legal tool the DHS is trying to use actually relates to federal laws around imported merchandise and it's clear the investigation isn't about that.

The complaint noted that many so-called resistance accounts have popped up since Trump's inauguration, claiming to be run by staff at various government agencies. Naturally, they are run anonymously, in order to avoid "retaliation, harassment, or even loss of livelihood that might occur if their real identities became known to their superiors".

The account in question claims to be run by a current federal employee, and sends tweets criticising the government's immigration policies, as well as raising concerns about "historical and recent mismanagement" at the agency.

Advertisement - Article continues below

The ACLU has said it will be "going to court to defend this user's right to anonymous speech", and said it was "glad" that Twitter was pushing back to defend the person or people behind the account.

The specific account in question, @ALT_USCIS, has seen its follower numbers leap since the case became public, suggesting the attention from the government is ensuring more people are aware of it. However, the administration may care less about follower counts and more about cracking down on leakers.

Featured Resources

Preparing for long-term remote working after COVID-19

Learn how to safely and securely enable your remote workforce

Download now

Cloud vs on-premise storage: What’s right for you?

Key considerations driving document storage decisions for businesses

Download now

Staying ahead of the game in the world of data

Create successful marketing campaigns by understanding your customers better

Download now

Transforming productivity

Solutions that facilitate work at full speed

Download now
Advertisement
Advertisement

Recommended

Visit/policy-legislation/general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/355337/ico-will-reduce-gdpr-fines-due-to
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)

ICO to relax GDPR enforcement during coronavirus economic downturn

16 Apr 2020
Visit/security/privacy/355304/nhs-working-with-apple-google-coronavirus-tracking-app
privacy

The NHS teams up with Apple and Google on coronavirus tracking app

14 Apr 2020
Visit/policy-legislation/data-protection/355250/health-sites-sharing-users-medical-data-with-major-tech
data protection

Health sites are 'unlawfully' sharing medical data with Facebook and Google

7 Apr 2020
Visit/policy-legislation/data-protection/355184/supreme-court-finds-morrisons-was-not-liable-for-2014
data protection

Supreme Court rules Morrisons was not liable for 2014 data breach

1 Apr 2020

Most Popular

Visit/laptops/29190/how-to-find-ram-speed-size-and-type
Laptops

How to find RAM speed, size and type

24 Jun 2020
Visit/mobile/google-android/356373/over-2-dozen-additional-android-apps-found-stealing-user-data
Google Android

Over two dozen Android apps found stealing user data

7 Jul 2020
Visit/cloud/356260/the-road-to-recovery
Sponsored

The road to recovery

30 Jun 2020