Housing developer hit with fine over data protection failure

ICO slaps firm with penalty for failing to comply with Subject Access Request

The exterior of the building used by the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO)

A housing developer has been slapped with almost 1,500 in fines and penalties by the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) over its failure to abide by data protection laws.

The developer, Magnacrest Ltd, failed to comply with a Subject Access Request, which led to it being brought before Westminster Magistrates and fined by the data protection watchdog.

The SAR was submitted to Magnacrest by an unnamed individual on 17 April 2017, and included a cheque for 10, to cover the processing fee that companies are legally allowed to charge for processing a SAR.

Magnacrest was reported to the ICO after it failed to provide the individual's data within the 40-day time limit mandated by UK data protection laws, and then repeatedly reminded of its legal responsibilities by the ICO via mail and phone.

After Magnacrest still refused to comply with the SAR, the ICO issued an enforcement notice on 30 January last year, compelling it to do so. Failing to comply with an enforcement notice is a criminal offence, and the developer was subsequently charged, pleading guilty on Wednesday this week.

Luckily for the Buckinghamshire-based developer, the SAR was submitted in 2017, before GDPR came into force. As such, its failure constituted a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998, and Magnacrest was only ordered to pay a 300 fine, 1,133.75 in prosecution costs and a 30 victim surcharge. Under GDPR, it would have been liable for a substantially higher fine.

"The right to access your own personal information is a fundamental and long-standing principle of data protection law," said the ICO's criminal enforcement manager Mike Shaw. "New laws brought into effect last May strengthen those rights even further."

"Organisations not only have to respect this right but must also respect notices from the ICO enforcing the law. If they fail to do so then they must accept the consequences, which can include a criminal prosecution."

Featured Resources

Managing security risk and compliance in a challenging landscape

How key technology partners grow with your organisation

Download now

Evaluate your order-to-cash process

15 recommended metrics to benchmark your O2C operations

Download now

AI 360: Hold, fold, or double down?

How AI can benefit your business

Download now

Getting started with Azure Red Hat OpenShift

A developer’s guide to improving application building and deployment capabilities

Download now

Recommended

Misconfigured Git servers lead to Nissan data leak
hacking

Misconfigured Git servers lead to Nissan data leak

7 Jan 2021
BackupAssist teams with Wasabi to offer cheaper backup for businesses
backup

BackupAssist teams with Wasabi to offer cheaper backup for businesses

6 Jan 2021
Data: A resource much too valuable to leave unprotected
Whitepaper

Data: A resource much too valuable to leave unprotected

2 Dec 2020
Webhose and Signal Corp boost data breach detection
Security

Webhose and Signal Corp boost data breach detection

7 Oct 2020

Most Popular

Citrix buys Slack competitor Wrike in record $2.25bn deal
collaboration

Citrix buys Slack competitor Wrike in record $2.25bn deal

19 Jan 2021
How to recover deleted emails in Gmail
email delivery

How to recover deleted emails in Gmail

6 Jan 2021
SolarWinds hackers hit Malwarebytes through Microsoft exploit
hacking

SolarWinds hackers hit Malwarebytes through Microsoft exploit

20 Jan 2021