Kaspersky’s attempt to overturn US government ban thrown out of court

Federal judge rules against security firm in lawsuit against Homeland Security

Kaspersky Lab has had both of its lawsuits against the US government rejected, derailing its plans to fight back against a ban on its software.

The company confirmed that it is planning to appeal the dismissal of its suits, which are in turn seeking to appeal against last year's ban - a measure that was enacted following allegations that Kaspersky's software was being used by the Russian intelligence agencies to spy on US government operations.

Advertisement - Article continues below

"Kaspersky Lab is disappointed with the Court's decisions on its constitutional challenges to the U.S. Government prohibitions on the use of its products and services by federal agencies," the company said in a statement regarding the ruling.

"We will vigorously pursue our appeal rights. Kaspersky Lab maintains that these actions were the product of unconstitutional agency and legislative processes and unfairly targeted the company without any meaningful fact finding."

The Russian security company had its software and services specifically banned from use within the federal government last year, cutting off one of the company's major potential revenue streams. The ban, which specifically targets Kaspersky, was signed into law by Congress as part of a funding bill, and accompanies a similar ban on government use issued by the Department of Homeland Security.

Advertisement
Advertisement - Article continues below

In response to this ban, Kaspersky mounted two lawsuits targeting both Congress and the DHS, arguing that the DHS directive was "unsupported by substantial evidence" and that Congress failed to abide by strictures preventing it from issuing legislation that determines guilt and issues punishment without a full trial.

Advertisement - Article continues below

These arguments were struck down on Wednesday by US District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, who said that the government's actions in banning Kaspersky "may very well have adverse consequences for some third-parties. But that does not make them unconstitutional". Kollar-Kotelly granted the government's motions to dismiss both lawsuits.

Kaspersky has protested its innocence throughout the case, asserting that it would never help any nation-state with surveillance and even launching a 'Global Transparency Initiative' in which it relocated several of its core operations to a Swiss datacentre from its Russian headquarters.

Featured Resources

The case for a marketing content hub

Transform your digital marketing to deliver customer expectations

Download now

Fast, flexible and compliant e-signatures for global businesses

Be at the forefront of digital transformation with electronic signatures

Download now

Why CEOS should care about the move to SAP S/4HANA

And how they can accelerate business value

Download now

IT faces new security challenges in the wake of COVID-19

Beat the crisis by learning how to secure your network

Download now
Advertisement

Most Popular

Visit/operating-systems/ios/355935/apple-confirms-serious-bugs-in-ios-135
iOS

Apple confirms serious bugs in iOS 13.5

4 Jun 2020
Visit/mobile/5g/355911/the-uk-pivots-to-japan-for-5g-equipment
5G

The UK looks to Japan and South Korea for 5G equipment

4 Jun 2020
Visit/security/ransomware/355945/new-ransomware-uses-java-to-target-software-organisations
ransomware

Tycoon ransomware discovered using Java image files to target software firms

5 Jun 2020