Multi-cloud vs hybrid cloud – what's the difference?
With no shortage of cloud providers, we take a look at two of the most popular options for businesses
Companies in every industry and sector are accelerating their digital transformation plans, particularly as more employees and more employees adopt a new, flexible way of working.
Cloud computing has played a key role in helping businesses, big and small, to modernise their IT infrastructure, improve security and develop innovative new ways to serve their customers. At the forefront of this movement are some of the biggest names in the technology industry, including Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google Cloud, IBM, Microsoft and VMware.
This means that not only is the cloud computing market fiercely competitive, but also that business have a host of options to choose from. What's more, the flexibility of the cloud means customers aren't limited to just one provider, which is where hybrid cloud and multi-cloud environments have come to prominence.
The distinction between the two is largely down to private and public cloud service. Private cloud refers to in-house on-premise infrastructure or managed services, while public cloud is a commodity product provided by the likes of AWS or Google Cloud. But what does this look like in practice?
Hybrid cloud, as its name suggests, mixes both public and private clouds. Services such as running payroll software can use the public cloud, for example, while things like inactive or "cold" data can live within the private cloud. Often the reason for using this format is to do with a need to balance flexibility with security, cost-effectiveness and latency.
While it may be cheaper to spin up some cloud instances for a time-limited development project and turn them off when no longer needed than provision extra capacity in an on-premise data centre. On the other hand, long-term storage is often cheaper in a private cloud than in the public cloud, and local laws may restrict what information can be stored in a third-party service as well.
Hybrid cloud used to be quite a niche model, with some industry watchers claiming it was just a step on the way to the full public cloud. Increasingly, however, it's becoming mainstream: A recent survey from RightScale estimated that the number of enterprises with a hybrid cloud strategy grew to 58% in 2019, up from 51% in 2018.
The hybrid cloud gives companies the reassurance that sensitive information, such as intellectual property or customer data, can still be stored and maintained within their own data centres. For organisations with lots of "cold" data - information that's accessed infrequently - it may also be cheaper to use a hybrid approach than full public cloud.
Hybrid approaches can be more technically difficult to manage, requiring IT departments to dedicate plenty of time and effort to configuration, planning, deployment and maintenance of two different platforms. On top of that, there's the arduous task of adapting in-house systems to work effectively with third-party ones. Security is also an issue with hybrid infrastructure, causing more major incidents than cloud-hosted applications or on-premise workloads. According to a 451 Research report, 51.8% of companies see hybrid cloud storage as less secure.
Your guide to the multi-cloud network
Adopt a software-based strategy with confidenceDownload now
Multi-cloud differs from hybrid cloud in that it uses multiple public cloud environments rather than a mixture of public and private. For example, an application in a multi-cloud environment may run all compute and networking activities in AWS while using database services from Microsoft's Azure.
It's a complex way of operating, but one that's rapidly on the rise within the business world. According to an IBM survey, 85% of organisations are now using a multi-cloud business model, with 76% of those opting for multiple hybrid clouds - just to confuse things further. It doesn't stop there: IBM also predicts that the number of companies using a multi-cloud strategy will increase to 98% by 2021.
Without being tied to one provider, companies can operate and innovate at speed. If tied to one host, you may find that, although it's great for some things, it might not have the best of everything, which could limit your ambitions.
This also reduces the risk of vendor lock-in, as companies won't necessarily become dependent on one provider's technology.
The obvious problem with a multi-cloud environment is the 'multi' part, as the more you use the more complicated it gets. This could lead to mismanagement and result in increased costs and disrupt your business, not to mention, the more clouds you use, the more you'll need to secure.
Four cyber security essentials that your board of directors wants to know
The insights to help you deliver what they needDownload now
Data: A resource much too valuable to leave unprotected
Protect your data to protect your companyDownload now
Improving cyber security for remote working
13 recommendations for security from any locationDownload now
Why CEOS should care about the move to SAP S/4HANA
And how they can accelerate business valueDownload now