Investigatory Powers bill’s security backdoors ‘won’t make iPhone illegal’

Encryption backdoors survive proposed House of Lords amendments

Accessing people's data via security backdoors will form a key part of the Investigatory Powers Bill, despite arguments it could make the new iPhone illegal, it emerged in Parliament this week.

The government's deputy leader in the House of Lords, Earl Howe, was adamant the bill must require telecoms companies to break or remove their own encryption to give government agencies access to people's personal data.

Debating the bill, he said: "If we do not provide for access to encrypted communications when it is necessary and proportionate to do so, we must simply accept that there can be areas online beyond the reach of the law, where criminals can go about their business unimpeded and without the risk of detection."

Howe added: "Enforcement and the intelligence agencies must retain the ability to require telecommunications operators to remove encryption in limited circumstancessubject to strong controls and safeguardsto address the increasing technical sophistication of those who would seek to do us harm."

He was defending the backdoor element of the bill from proposed amendments 92, 102 and 103, which would have removed this section of the legislation.

"They are an [sic] irresponsible proposals, which would remove the government's ability to give a technical capability notice to telecommunications operators requiring them to remove encryption from the communications of criminals, terrorists and foreign spies," Howe said.

However, one proponent of the amendments, the Liberal Democrats' Lord Paul Strasburger, suggested the Investigatory Powers' backdoors are incompatible with IT companies' use of end-to-end encryption.

"The implication of what he is saying is that no one may develop end-to-end encryption," he said. 

"He seems to be implying that providers can use only encryption which can be broken and therefore cannot be end to end, so the next version of the Apple iPhone would, in theory, become illegal."

Howe denied this, instead insisting that "there will be circumstances where it is reasonably practicable for a company to build in a facility to de-encrypt the contents of communication".

None of the above amendments were made to the bill. Its passage through Parliament continues with debate in the House of Lords, after the House of Commons voted it through with 444 MPs in favour.

Featured Resources

Five lessons learned from the pivot to a distributed workforce

Delivering continuity and scale with a remote work strategy

Download now

Connected experiences in a digital transformation

Enable businesses to meet the demands of the future

Download now

Simplify to secure

Reduce complexity by integrating your security ecosystem

Download now

Enhance the safety and security of your people, assets and operations

Enable a true vision of security with an engineered solution based on hyperconverged and storage platforms

Download now

Recommended

'Largest ever' Magecart hack compromises 2,000 online stores
hacking

'Largest ever' Magecart hack compromises 2,000 online stores

15 Sep 2020
Infocyte integrates with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
cyber security

Infocyte integrates with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR

19 Aug 2020
Andrew Daniels joins Druva as CIO and CISO
Cloud

Andrew Daniels joins Druva as CIO and CISO

22 Jul 2020
University of California gets fleeced by hackers for $1.14 million
ransomware

University of California gets fleeced by hackers for $1.14 million

30 Jun 2020

Most Popular

Accenture ploughs $3 billion into cloud migration support group
digital transformation

Accenture ploughs $3 billion into cloud migration support group

17 Sep 2020
16 ways to speed up your laptop
Laptops

16 ways to speed up your laptop

16 Sep 2020
Google Pixel 4a review: A picture-perfect package
Google Android

Google Pixel 4a review: A picture-perfect package

18 Sep 2020