Oki MC342dnw review

An imposing laser printer with all the key features, great text quality and excellent print speeds

IT Pro Recommended
Price
£195
  • Good paper-handling options; Speedy printing; Excellent print quality;
  • Absolutely gigantic; Expensive, with high running costs; Complicated interface;

The Oki MC342dnw is a business-grade laser in the same class as Lexmark's CX310dn. In fact, it's a step up: while Lexmark's printer misses out on fax and wireless capabilities, the MC342dnw comes with both as standard. Not surprisingly, there's a cost to that. Oki's offering is the most expensive printers in its bracket, save for rivals like Epson's EcoTank inkjet.

Still, there are reasons to invest in a good-quality laser. Speed is one of them, and the MC342dnw doesn't disappoint here. Across all of our printing tests it proved a smidgen faster than the Lexmark: for everyday mono document printing we saw an average 20ppm, versus the CX310dn's 18.7ppm.

Sharp, precise printing is another traditional strength of laser technology, and we can't fault the quality of text produced by the Oki. Even under the magnifying glass, small text appeared faultlessly even and readable. Solid blocks of colour were another strength, helping charts and diagrams to really pop. The Oki's Achilles heel is colour gradients: transitions that were perfectly smooth onscreen showed distracting banding on the page, while pale hues abruptly fall off to white rather than shading gradually away. It won't ruin your handouts, but they'll look slicker on the Lexmark.

Colour handling is a slightly weak point for the scanner, too. We were impressed by the fine detail the Oki could resolve, but we found the default settings produced low-contrast output: blacks were dark grey, whites were light grey, and the overall coloration was muted compared to rival scans.

At first it seemed that speed would be a strength, after our 200ppi single-page greyscale scan completed in a creditable 12 seconds. But switching to the ADF didn't speed things up as much as we'd hoped, and our ten-page document took 1min 22secs to reach the desktop. Colour scans were even slower: our 300ppi A4 page took 84 seconds to arrive, and at 600ppi it took more than four-and-a-half minutes.

The Oki's paper-handling options are good, with double-sided printing available from either the 250-sheet paper cassette or the separate 100-sheet tray. That doesn't justify the sheer size of the unit, though: with the tray extended and loaded with paper, the MC342dnw has a gigantic 427 x 769mm footprint, which could on its own be a deal-breaker where space is limited.

While we're on the subject of uncomfortably large things, the Oki's running costs do nothing to offset the high price of the printer. At 2.7p per mono page and 14.4p for colour, it's not quite the most expensive printer around, but it's not far off on either count. If you end up printing between 1,500 and 9,000 mono pages over the lifetime of your printer, the Oki is the costliest way to do it. (For larger volumes, the Ricoh takes that dubious distinction.)

We must also mention the Oki's interface. The 9cm mono LCD is surrounded by no fewer than 40 buttons (some of which double as illuminated indicators). The onscreen directions are fairly clear - we didn't get lost at any point while testing the printer - but it can feel overwhelming. If you value clarity and simplicity in an interface, look elsewhere.

The Oki MC342dnw is certainly a more likeable printer than the Ricoh SP C250SF, and more versatile than the Xerox 6022V. For a busy workspace where a few hundred pounds a year in running costs is a drop in the ocean, and where keeping up with large volumes of colour documents is more important than pitch-perfect colour reproduction, it could be a good fit. But since the Lexmark beats it on price, print quality and scan speed, the Oki wouldn't be our first choice unless built-in fax capabilities are non-negotiable.

This review originally appeared in PC Pro issue 262

Verdict

For a busy workspace where a few hundred pounds a year in running costs is a drop in the ocean, and where keeping up with large volumes of colour documents is more important than pitch-perfect colour reproduction, it could be a good fit, but it wouldn’t be our first choice unless built-in fax capabilities are non-negotiable.

Featured Resources

Next-generation time series: Forecasting for the real world, not the ideal world

Solve time series problems with AI

Free download

The future of productivity

Driving your business forward with Microsoft Office 365

Free download

How to plan for endpoint security against ever-evolving cyber threats

Safeguard your devices, data, and reputation

Free download

A quantitative comparison of UPS monitoring and servicing approaches across edge environments

Effective UPS fleet management

Free download

Recommended

Inkjet vs Laser printers
Hardware

Inkjet vs Laser printers

1 Oct 2021
Lexmark MC3326i review: A tempting proposition
Hardware

Lexmark MC3326i review: A tempting proposition

19 Aug 2021
Kyocera Ecosys M6235cidn review: Worth splashing out on
peripherals

Kyocera Ecosys M6235cidn review: Worth splashing out on

12 Aug 2021
Canon i-Sensys MF744Cdw review: A one-touch wonder
peripherals

Canon i-Sensys MF744Cdw review: A one-touch wonder

29 Jul 2021

Most Popular

Best Linux distros 2021
operating systems

Best Linux distros 2021

11 Oct 2021
Apple MacBook Pro 15in vs Dell XPS 15: Clash of the titans
Laptops

Apple MacBook Pro 15in vs Dell XPS 15: Clash of the titans

11 Oct 2021
Royal Mint to recover gold from smartphones and laptops in world first
Technology

Royal Mint to recover gold from smartphones and laptops in world first

21 Oct 2021